Millions of cancelled healthcare appointments and lengthy waits for care abound in UK, New Zealand, and in the US
Strikes continue on multiple continents as thousands of healthcare workers walk off the job. Doctors, medical laboratory scientists, nurses, phlebotomists and others around the world have taken to the picket lines complaining about low wages, inadequate staffing, and dangerous working conditions.
In England, junior doctors (the general equivalent of medical interns in the US) continue their uphill battle to have their complaints heard by the UK government. As a result, at hospitals and clinics throughout the United Kingdom, more than one million appointments have been cancelled due to strikes, according to the BBC.
“The true scale of the disruption is likely to be higher—many hospitals reduce bookings on strike days to minimize last-minute cancellations,” the BBC reported. “A total of one million hospital appointments have had to be rescheduled along with more than 60,000 community and mental health appointments since December [2022], when industrial action started in the National Health Service (NHS).”
According to The Standard, “Consultants in England are to be re-balloted over the prospect of further strike action as doctors and the government remain in talks with a view to end the dispute. The British Medical Association (BMA) said that specialist, associate specialist, and specialty (SAS) doctors will also be balloted over potential strike action.”
“We must be prepared to take the next step and ballot for industrial action if we absolutely have to—and we will do this … if upcoming negotiations fail to achieve anything for our profession,” Ujjwala Anand Mohite, DRCPath, FEBPath (above), a histopathologist at the NHS, Dudley Group of Hospitals, and the first female Chair of the SAS committee UK, told The Guardian.
New Zealand Doctors, Clinical Laboratory Workers Strike
In September, the first-ever nationwide senior doctor strike occurred in New Zealand and was then followed by another strike of about 5,000 doctors and 100 dentists from New Zealand’s public hospitals, the World Socialist Web Site reported.
Similar to the UK, the strikes reflect mounting frustration over pay not keeping up with inflation and “decades of deteriorating conditions in the public health system,” the WSWS noted.
This follows months of strikes by the island nation’s medical laboratory workers, which are ongoing.
“Our pay scales, if you compare them internationally, are not competitive. About half of our specialists come from abroad, so it’s quite important for the country’s health system to be able to attract and keep people,” Andy Davies, a lung specialist who joined the picket outside 484-bed Wellington Hospital, told the WSWS.
“We’re not asking for the world, we’re asking for an inflationary pay rise, and we haven’t had an inflationary pay rise year-on-year, and it’s beginning to show,” he added.
“What type of health system do they want?” he continued. “Do we want one that treats all people and manages what they need, or do we want a hacked down system that does less?”
The conflicts over pay and working conditions have caused many healthcare workers in New Zealand to leave the field entirely. This has led to severe shortages of qualified workers.
“Patient waiting times—for cancer, hip replacements, cardiac problems, and many other conditions—have exploded due to understaffed and overwhelmed hospitals,” the WSWS reported.
US Healthcare Workers also Striking
The US has its share of striking healthcare workers as well. Healthcare Dive tracked 23 ongoing or anticipated strikes throughout the nation’s healthcare industry since January 1, 2023. In 2022, there were 15 strikes of healthcare workers at the nation’s hospitals and health systems.
These walkouts include doctors, nurses, pharmacy workers, imaging specialists, and thousands of frontline healthcare workers striking over dangerously low staffing levels, unsafe working conditions, and low pay.
In October, 75,000 nurses, support staff, and medical technicians from Kaiser Permanente participated in a 72-hour strike comprised of hundreds of hospitals and clinics throughout California, Washington state, Oregon, Virginia, and the District of Columbia, Reuters reported.
The three-day strike, “Marked the largest work stoppage to date in the healthcare sector,” Reuters noted. Doctors, managers, and contingency workers were employed to keep hospitals and emergency departments functioning.
“The dispute is focused on workers’ demands for better pay and measures to ease chronic staff shortages and high turnover that union officials say has undermined patient care at Kaiser,” Reuters stated.
Staffing shortages following the COVID-19 pandemic are partly to blame for current struggles, but contract staffing to fill critical positions has exacerbated the problem.
“Kaiser’s outsourcing of healthcare duties to third-party vendors and subcontractors has also emerged as a major sticking point in talks that have dragged on for six months. … The clash has put Kaiser Permanente at the forefront of growing labor unrest in the healthcare industry—and across the US economy—driven by the erosion of workers’ earning power from inflation and pandemic-related disruptions in the workforce,” Reuters noted.
Across the globe, many healthcare workers—including clinical laboratory scientists in countries like New Zealand—are feeling burnt out from working in understaffed departments for inadequate pay. Hopefully, in response to these strikes, governments and healthcare leaders can come to resolutions that bring critical medical specialists back to work.
State’s new program helps ensure local communities have access to a community hospital and its physicians and clinical laboratories
Like phoenixes rising from ashes, a number of bankrupt and shuttered California hospitals have new life due in part to a state-run program offering the healthcare providers interest-free loans. The medical staff in these hospitals—including the clinical laboratories—will be happy to learn that their local communities refused to let their preferred healthcare providers shut down and disappear.
“The program, established through Assembly Bill 112, offers interest-free, working capital loans to nonprofit and publicly operated financially-distressed hospitals, including facilities that belong to integrated healthcare systems with less than three separately licensed hospital facilities,” according to the news release.
This clearly demonstrates that even as both physicians and patient are increasingly comfortable with telehealth consultations—and having their healthcare conditions managed in ambulatory settings—the concept of the community hospital as an essential medical resource continues to motivate local governments and citizens to invest money in money-losing hospitals.
“Today we have provided much needed assistance to community hospitals across the state that desperately need financial help to provide the care their communities need,” said HCAI Director Elizabeth Landsberg (above). “I’m grateful to the legislature for spearheading this effort to help make sure these vital healthcare institutions are fiscally stable so they can continue to provide quality, affordable healthcare for all Californians.” Thanks to these loans, clinical laboratories in these hospitals will continue to perform critical testing for their communities. (Photo copyright: Gilbert Perez/HCAI.)
Providers Get Support with Conditions
Among the 17 healthcare providers receiving loans is Madera Community Hospital, a 106-bed hospital that served a rural area in California’s Central Valley. Madera, which closed in December and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy earlier this year, is one of 17 “troubled hospitals” in California getting a “lifeline,” KFF Health News reported.
Madera will receive a $2 million bridge loan earmarked toward operational costs. It is also eligible for a $50 million loan once Adventist Health, Madera’s intended new administrator, offers up a “comprehensive hospital turnaround plan,” HCAI noted.
“California hospitals face many financial challenges, and for independent rural hospitals, these challenges can sometimes be almost insurmountable,” said Kerry Heinrich, JD, President and CEO of Adventist Health, in a blog post leading up to the state’s announcement of loan awards. “If Madera succeeds in getting the financial resources it needs, Adventist Health will provide Madera Community Hospital with the expertise of a large healthcare system, helping to secure a sustainable future for healthcare in Madera County.”
It’s interesting to note that potential “operators” are watching to see if the hospital or State of California can arrange tens of millions of dollars in loans or other financing before they agree to come in and manage the hospital.
The Distressed Hospital Loan Program aims to provide “loans (repayable over six years) to not-for-profit hospitals and public hospitals, as defined, in significant financial distress or to governmental entities representing a closed hospital to prevent the closure or facilitate the reopening of a closed hospital,” according to California Assembly Bill 112.
“The hospitals approved for this program have shown a detailed plan for financial recovery, and these funds will help them keep the doors open so they can keep serving their communities,” Fiona Ma, CPA, California State Treasurer, told Cal Matters.
Also receiving financial support is Beverly Hospital, a 202-bed Montebello, California, provider set to be purchased by Adventist Health White Memorial of Los Angeles, Cal Matters reported.
Beverly Hospital received a $5 million bridge loan to use toward operation costs while it is “purchased out of bankruptcy,” HCAI said in the news release.
Another hospital getting a “lifeline” is Hazel Hawkins Memorial in Hollister, California. The 25-bed level IV trauma center will receive a $10 million loan.
Other Ailing Hospitals Getting Interest-free Loans
According to HCAI, the other 14 hospitals receiving loans include:
What Led California’s Hospitals to Financial Hardship?
According to Cal Matters, hospitals in California are “distressed” due to rising labor costs and inadequate reimbursement from Medicare, Medi-Cal, and commercial insurance.
One in five California hospitals is at risk of closure due to “an unsustainable combination of negative margins, decreasing cash positions, and increasing debt.”
Hospital expenses in 2022 were $23.4 billion over pre-pandemic levels, outpacing revenue increases.
Operating income in 2022 was $8.5 billion less than in 2019.
Will Consumer Demand Affect California’s Success?
California’s commitment to its financially struggling hospitals comes amid national trends suggesting physicians and patients—especially younger healthcare consumers—are becoming increasingly comfortable with remote healthcare monitoring and receiving primary care in non-traditional environments, such as retail pharmacies and clinics.
Will younger Californian’s demand for low-cost, convenient healthcare render the state’s attempt to rehabilitee its failing hospitals moot? Time will tell. The ongoing financial woes of California hospitals will be watched by hospital-based clinical lab managers and pathologists in other states. That’s because California has a reputation for being first in the nation in attempts to address problems or regulate activity.
Regardless, it’s clear that—at this moment—the state is willing to invest in hospitals with a history of deteriorating financial performance as a way of ensuring access to healthcare for all of its citizens.
As mergers and acquisitions of large-scale hospital systems continue, their clinical laboratories feel the pressure of deteriorating finances and ongoing staff shortages
In response to the latest National Hospital Flash Report from Kaufman Hall, the financial/performance consulting firm’s Senior Vice President, Eric Swanson, wrote that 2022 was “shaping up to be one of the worst financial years on record for hospitals.
“Expense pressures—particularly with the cost of labor—outpaced revenues and drove poor performance [in hospitals]. While emergency department visits and operating room minutes increased slightly, hospitals struggled to discharge patients due to internal staffing shortages and shortages at post-acute facilities,” Swanson noted.
Like their parent organizations, hospital and health system-based medical laboratories are dealing with ongoing staffing shortages, which Dark Daily covered extensively in multiple ebriefings.
Non-profit healthcare systems are particularly hard hit, leading to merger/acquisition deals that continue the trend of hospital consolidation.
“Consolidation will continue. Here’s the scary part. The old solutions of jacking up treatment volumes and commercial payment rates aren’t working. Evidence of business model failure abounds. A fiscal storm is raging,” David Johnson, CEO, 4sight Health, wrote in an article for the Healthcare Financial Management Association. The results of these business failures have a direct impact on hospital-based medical laboratories as well as clinical laboratories in surrounding areas that service a health system’s physicians. (Photo copyright: 4sight Health.)
The numbers speak volumes. Looking at financial statements from 2022, Ascension, Cleveland Clinic, CommonSpirit Health, Providence, and Mass General Brigham all posted losses of more than $316 million dollars, the HFMA series noted. Two in that group (CommonSpirit and Providence) posted losses over $1.1 billion. Providence’s losses represented only nine months of data from 2022.
So, what’s the problem? In another HFMA article titled, “The End of Traditional Nonprofit Healthcare Business Models?” Johnson wrote, “Even in the best of times, the nonprofit hospital business model has never been robust. Hospitals are capital-intensive, labor-intensive, highly-regulated, low-margin businesses that require high-cost facilities and highly expert personnel to operate.
“Competing mission and business priorities make running nonprofit hospitals even more difficult,” he added. “The existential question is whether current operating losses at nonprofit health systems are aberrant or indicate a broader collapse of their models. I believe it’s the latter. Structural weaknesses, combined with pernicious macro forces, make this a period of unprecedented challenge for nonprofit providers.”
In his “Cracks in the Foundation” series, Johnson lists five “deeply embedded defects in current nonprofit business models.” They are:
Artificial economics
Needs-services mismatch
Brittle business models
Regulatory headwinds
Inadequate leadership
“Under pressure, health systems are struggling to right the ship, but they are defaulting to old habits,” Johnson wrote. “They’re chasing volume and rates under fee-for-service (FFS) medicine. While this has worked in the past, it is not a viable long-term strategy. Powerful macro forces are aligning against healthcare business practices. Ignoring them won’t make them go away.”
This chart, taken from 4sight Health CEO David Johnson’s HFMA article, shows the five large health systems that showed operating losses in 2022. The numbers displayed are drawn from each health system’s publicly released financial statements for the periods shown, HFMA noted. (Graphic copyright: Healthcare Financial Management Association.)
Deteriorating Outlook for Health Systems
Increased expenses for labor and supplies paired with inflation is what a 2022 Fitch Ratings report cited as contributing to a “‘deteriorating’ outlook for systems,” Healthcare Dive reported.
“Labor will remain the largest hurdle for hospitals this year even as they struggle with inflation and spiking COVID-19 admissions that can dent revenue. The labor story just dwarfs the inflation story,” financial analyst Kevin Holloran, Senior Director and Sector Leader USPF Healthcare at Fitch Ratings, told Healthcare Dive.
Holloran has worked for Fitch since 2017, joining after 14 years at S/P Global Ratings. He has 20-years experience in the healthcare sector.
Nonprofit hospitals that posted COVID-19-related operating losses are struggling with higher costs for labor and supplies while navigating declining and neutral admission volumes, Healthcare Dive noted, citing that healthcare systems have turned to staffing agencies and contracted labor to counter the loss of burned-out employees who go on strike or who leave healthcare entirely. On a positive note, Holloran sees contract labor use decreasing in the future.
What’s Next?
There’s a steep road ahead for nonprofits but Holloran see positive changes. “We are beginning to come out of the worst of it,” he told Healthcare Dive. However, he added, “Hospitals should not expect to ‘grow [their] way out’ of soaring labor expenses by raising revenues or increasing hospital admissions.”
Like Johnson, Holloran stressed the importance of looking for long-term solutions. With rising expenses, declining revenues, and increased labor costs projected to continue for years, “hospitals are putting recruiting and retention efforts ‘on steroids’ amid challenges,” he noted.
One coming improvement is that hospitals “can look toward commercial payer contracts to ease high expenses,” Holloran predicted.
“Payer contracts fall in the approximately 25% to 30% of non-fixed revenue that hospitals have the ability to control. … The ratings agency [Fitch] now expects to see a shift from long-term contracts to single-year contracts as nonprofits attempt to ease expenses,” Healthcare Dive noted.
It appears that, for the foreseeable future, clinical laboratories will continue to feel the pressures brought on by mergers and acquisitions as the healthcare industry struggles to find solutions to the economic downturn and loss of qualified staff following the COVID-19 pandemic.
Post-merger, a first goal is often to achieve cost savings by consolidating hospital laboratory testing into fewer medical laboratory sites
Major integrated delivery network (IDN) healthcare systems continue to acquire other hospitals. These deals are getting larger in scope and confirm that the trend of hospital consolidation is robust and ongoing. They also present a challenge for clinical laboratories that service the IDN’s physicians from both inside and outside the networked systems.
One most recent example is the announced mega-merger of non-profit BJC HealthCare (BJC) in St. Louis and faith-based non-profit Saint Luke’s Health System (St. Luke’s) in Kansas City, both in Missouri. St. Louis Post-Dispatch described the deal as “one of the biggest local hospital mergers in recent memory.”
And for good reason. According to Healthcare Dive, the partnership that will create a 28-hospital, $10 billion dollar health system with more than 100 specialty and primary care offices serving patients in Illinois, Kansas, and Missouri. Fiscally, BJC showed $6.3 billion in revenue last year and Saint Luke’s $2.4 billion.
Mega mergers are a big deal (pun intended). They can give the new healthcare organization unrivaled competitive authority in the marketplace potentially passing along lower healthcare prices to patients. But they come at cost to embedded clinical staff, including medical laboratories.
The health system merger gives BJC/St. Luke’s “huge leverage in terms of negotiating power with the insurers,” Ryan Barker, an independent healthcare policy consultant, told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Clinical laboratories are also impacted in these mergers when hospital systems consolidate their testing capabilities and locations. (Photo copyright: Missouri Foundation for Health.)
Impact of the BJC/St. Luke’s Merger
BJC and St. Luke’s signed a non-binding agreement to merge on May 31 and plan to reach a final agreement before the year’s end barring regulatory interference. The duo’s combined 28-hospital system will operate out of two headquarters: One in St. Louis managing southern Illinois and eastern Missouri, and another in Kansas City to serve parts of Kansas as well as western Missouri, Healthcare Dive reported.
The merger of BJC and St. Luke’s means the formation of a “clear market leader in Missouri,” St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported, adding that BJC has 40% of the market’s patient discharges and St. Luke’s holds 20% of the market share in the “state’s second largest metropolitan area.”
This will likely manifest itself in leverage during negotiations with healthcare payers that service that area.
“It continues to be the case that the hospitals are trying to gain the upper hand on the insurers,” John Romley, PhD, Associate Professor in the University of Southern California (USC) Price School of Public Policy and USC Mann School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Romley is also an economist at the USC Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, and adjunct economist at the Rand Corporation. “That was true 10 years ago. That’s true today,” he added.
“That’s what I always worry about with consolidation is the impact on [healthcare] pricing,” Ryan Barker, an independent healthcare policy consultant in St. Louis and former Vice President of Health Policy at Missouri Foundation for Health, told the Post-Dispatch.
Other Large Health System Mergers and Acquisitions
There have been a growing number of large-scale mergers and acquisitions of IDNs in the last few months. Dark Daily’s sister publication The Dark Report has covered these deals in multiple intelligence briefings.
Healthcare policy makers were surprised by the merger, as Kaiser and Geisinger were often cited as two of the best IDNs in the nation.
Now under single ownership there will be implications that take years to play out, especially for clinical laboratories that now must service a significantly larger physician base. Conversely, if the new combined healthcare system decides to combine multiple medical laboratories to save on costs it will have a huge impact on lab staff.
Another deal recently announced involves UPMC’s (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center) announcement to merge with multihospital Washington Health System (WHS) in Washington, Pennsylvania, a WHS news release noted. But the move has drawn pushback from elected officials and organized labor, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported.
UPMC has recorded rapid growth over the year acquiring smaller hospitals, but hospital mergers are getting closer inspections from federal regulators, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette noted.
SEIU Healthcare Pennsylvania—part of the Service Employees International Union—was first to request an investigation by the US Department of Justice for what it called a “long and egregious history of labor law violations.” It also claimed that UPMC merged with 27 hospitals from 1996 to 2019, adding 10 between 2016 and 2018, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported.
Concentrated ownership of diagnostic services impacts clinical laboratories in many ways. The Dark Report noted that combined IDNs often review clinical laboratory services across the entire healthcare network. Opportunities for third-party commercial labs to step in and run the hospitals’ local laboratory services may also present themselves.
Impact IDN Mergers Have on Clinical Laboratories
Mergers occur for many reasons. Monetary stress has a wide-reaching impact, and some healthcare researchers suggest that financial pressures may cause hospitals formerly hopeful about their medical laboratory outreach businesses to consider selling their programs, as The Dark Report noted.
One significant impact that health system mergers and acquisitions can have on clinical laboratories is to reduce their number, particularly by consolidating testing from multiple sites into a core laboratory.
“There is a growing body of empirical research about the potential for competitive harm to labor markets from consolidation and concentration,” Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, JD and FTC Chair Lina M. Khan, JD, wrote in a joint 2022 statement about the merger of the first and second biggest healthcare providers in Rhode Island. “The loss of competition from mergers may be especially pernicious in the healthcare sector where skilled medical professionals are uniquely limited in employer options within their local geographic area,” the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported.
In this case, the plans to merge were ended after the FTC sued to block the partnership.
More IDN Mergers on the Way
But increased FTC scrutiny does not seem to have slowed the trend toward larger merger and acquisition deals. Kaufman Hall’s 2023 National Hospital Flash Report states that both mergers and acquisitions are trending toward cross-regional partnerships and predicts a “new wave of transaction activity,” Healthcare Dive reported. The report looks at actual and budget data collected over the past three years that was sampled from more than 900 hospitals on a recurring monthly basis.
And so, moving into the future, clinical laboratories can expect to see more mergers and acquisitions of IDNs, with consolidation, regionalization, and standardization occurring in the combined IDN’s clinical laboratory once the merger is completed and leadership begins to look for ways to save costs. Labs are generally first to be consolidated because it is easier to move lab specimens than it is to move patients.
Funded by the CDC, the program hopes to alleviate personnel shortages in Baltimore area clinical labs while also producing a knowledge base for lab managers nationwide
Clinical laboratory managers struggling to fill vacant phlebotomy and accessioning positions will be interested to learn about a pilot program being conducted by the City of Baltimore and the University of Maryland School of Medicine to train people “for employment in hospital laboratories, phlebotomy draw sites, and reference laboratory processing centers,” according to The Elm, a publication of the University of Maryland, Baltimore.
The 14-week “Mayor’s Workforce Development Program” began on April 19 and will continue through the end of July. Participants meet twice a week for lectures and experience working with specimens in actual medical laboratories or in a “hybrid learning environment,” The Elm reported.
“I came up with the idea of doing cross-training for laboratory people and public health people in case there is another pandemic,” explained Lorraine Doucette in an exclusive interview with Dark Daily. Doucette, who is managing the pilot program, is an Assistant Professor and Medical Laboratory Science Program Director, Department of Medical and Research Technology, University of Maryland School of Medicine.
“There is already a huge shortage of laboratory people, but an enormous amount left in droves during the pandemic because they got physically burned out. Some just could not do the work anymore because of things like carpal tunnel syndrome and repetitive stress injuries,” she added.
“I’m confident that all 15 or 16 students who complete this workforce program will be employed within weeks of finishing as accessioners,” said Lorraine Doucette (above), Assistant Professor and Medical Laboratory Science Program Director, Department of Medical and Research Technology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, in an exclusive interview with Dark Daily. “This has been so successful. This is making a difference in people’s lives. This is changing them from being unemployed to actually having a career in a clinical laboratory. They love it. They are so proud of themselves.” (Photo copyright: LinkedIn.)
CDC Funding Part of National Program to ‘Enhance’ Clinical Lab Workforce
The collaboration is part of a CDC project titled, “Enhancing US Clinical Workforce Capacity.’ Doucette will receive a total of one million dollars over the course of three years to facilitate the program in stages.
“It is not necessarily an old-fashioned grant where they just gave me a pile of money,” Doucette told Dark Daily. “The CDC works with me constantly via reports and Zoom meetings.”
This CDC project is designed to both cross train clinical laboratory professionals in public health, clinical chemistry, microbiology, and hematology, as well as to train individuals in the workforce development program to become laboratory accessioners.
“They are going to be qualified to work as an accessioner in any local hospital,” Doucette noted. “The people who pick up the lab samples out of the tube system are the accessioners and there is a huge shortage of them also. We’re teaching them the basics so the more advanced lab personnel can perform the higher-level work.”
Students in the program learn all about lab safety and the proper handling of lab samples as well as proper data entry, professionalism, and how to communicate with medical and laboratory personnel. They work with urine and blood samples and fabricated spinal fluid samples.
“They are taught about the different tubes, what the anticoagulants are, what makes each tube unique, why you can’t mix samples, balancing a centrifuge, and how to properly put on and remove safety gear like lab coats, gloves, and goggles,” Doucette explained.
The Mayor’s Workforce Development Program is free for Baltimore residents looking for employment via the workforce office. The only requirements for enrolling are having a high school education and being fully vaccinated.
Phlebotomy and Additional Cross-training to Be Added
Doucette would eventually like to add a phlebotomy segment to future training sessions. “We would like to develop an additional partnership with BCCC (Baltimore City Community College) for the phlebotomy piece. That would definitely increase the people and the program’s marketability,” she said. “They could not only draw the blood, but they could also process the sample.”
After assessing the success of the current program and determining what did and did not work, there will be an additional training session held in the fall. Next year, there will be more sessions held for individuals in the workforce program and cross-training classes for current clinical laboratory professionals.
The strategy for the third year of the grant includes sharing the specifics of the program with medical laboratory professionals via the CDC’s free OneLab REACH platform. This portion includes the online delivery of documentation such as training sheets, lab exercises, Microsoft PowerPoint presentations, and videos used in both the accessioning and cross-training coursework.
“We’re going to do the OneLab REACH,” Doucette said. “I’m going to be putting it all online and marketing it all around the country in stages and increments. I will be going to a lot of professional society meetings and talking to lab managers to help them understand the concept of how this all benefits them.”
This unique collaboration between the City of Baltimore and University of Maryland School of Medicine, funded by the CDC, should help alleviate some of the clinical laboratory worker shortages that exist in the Baltimore area. Hopefully, the effort will result in additional knowledge, resources, and tools to assist medical lab managers across the country to recruit and retain talented, highly-skilled workers.
Family medicine academic departments in Canada are dealing with a shortage of applicants qualified for their residency programs, mirroring the shortage of pathologists
For the past decade, the number of medical residencies in Alberta Canada that went unfilled have increased each year. Now, just like in many parts of America, the province is experiencing severe medical staffing shortages that includes clinical laboratories and pathology groups.
According to data compiled by the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS), after the first round of matching for post-graduate training spots as many as 12% of all spots went unfilled, especially in family medicine, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) reported.
Though the trend seems to be worse in Alberta, the resident shortage is affecting the entire Canadian healthcare system. According to the Angus Reid Institute, approximately half of all Canadians cannot find a doctor or get a timely appointment with their current doctor.
That is fueling predictions of an increased physician shortage in coming years, particularly in Alberta.
The graphic above taken from the CBC report shows how the number of residencies in family medicine that go unfilled has been increasing for the past 10 years. This trend mirrors similar trends affecting clinical laboratories and pathology groups around the world. (Graphic copyright: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.)
Internationally Trained versus Home-grown Doctors
Canada’s current doctor shortage appears to be rooted in red tape that determines which MDs qualify for residency matching. According to John Paul Tasker, a senior journalist at the CBC, “there’s no shortage of doctors in Canada. What we have is a shortage of licensed doctors.” In his article, “Canada Is Short of Doctors—and It’s Turning Away Hundreds of Its Own Physicians Each Year,” Tasker notes that there may be as many as 13,000 medical doctors in Canada who are not currently practicing.
What’s standing in the way of Canadian doctors becoming licensed to practice? Some claim the system of residency matching is discriminatory towards Canadian doctors who received their training outside of Canada. Rosemary Pawliuk, President of the Society for Canadians Studying Medicine Abroad, is one of those who believe the system of matching is broken.
“They have cute slogans like, ‘You’re wanted and welcome in Canada,’ but when you look at the barriers, it’s very clear that you should not come home. Their message is essentially, ‘Go away’ and so [doctors] do,” Pawliuk told the CBC.
According the Pawliuk, “the current residency selection system puts internationally trained Canadian doctors at a serious disadvantage,” the CBC reported. “The Canadian public should be entitled to the best qualified Canadian applicant. Whether they’ve graduated from a Canadian school or an international school, whether they’re a Canadian by birth or if they’re an immigrant, they should be competing on individual merit,” she added.
Canada’s Medical School Matching Bias
In Canada’s current matching system, medical schools decide who gets a residency. Critics say the schools are biased towards Canadian-educated doctors and overlook foreign-trained doctors. About 90% of all residencies in Canada are set aside for Canadian-trained doctors and the remaining spots are left for the physicians trained abroad, CBC noted.
It is important to note that these doctors who are trained abroad are either Canadian citizens or permanent residents. Thus, it’s not a question of citizens from other countries competing with Canadian citizens.
So, if a surplus of doctors are being shut out of residency training opportunities, why are there open slots in Alberta? Some believe this indicates individuals are not interested in practicing medicine in Alberta.
But, Nathan Rider, MD, President of the Professional Association of the Resident Physicians of Alberta (PARA), claims he has not heard of residents turning down Alberta. He notes that the factors of where a resident may want to go geographically often depend on factors such as proximity to loved ones, cost of living, and program culture.
But Rinaldi still has concerns, “We may fill them with 42 disinterested people who have no interest in family medicine,” she says.
Anderson admits that “Across the country, over the last five or more years, family medicine has become less popular with medical students graduating from medical schools than it was in the years before.”
Therefore, both Anderson’s and Hemmelgarn’s schools have changed curriculum to put more of an emphasis on family medicine. Perhaps with these changes, and possibly an opening for internationally-trained Canadian doctors to achieve residency positions, Alberta’s—indeed all of Canada’s—residency match days will be better attended.
In the United States, there is little news coverage about serious problems with the health systems in other nations. The experience of residency programs in Canada, as explained above, demonstrates how a different national health system has unique issues that are not identical to issues in the US healthcare system. What is true is that Canada is dealing with a similar shortage of skilled medical technologists (MTs) and clinical laboratory scientists (CLSs), just like here in the United States.
