CDC Study: Rate of Nosocomial Infections in Nation’s Hospitals Increased During the COVID-19 Pandemic
CDC’s findings are a setback for the national effort to encourage hospitals and their clinical laboratories to reduce the number of nosocomial infections and practice better antimicrobial stewardship
Nosocomial infections—also known as hospital-acquired infections—increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. That’s according to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report that showed increases in several HAIs, including a 14% jump in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from 2020 to 2021.
The CDC’s 2021 National and State Healthcare-Associated Infections Progress Report suggests that “the pandemic may have permanently damaged the ability of hospitals to prevent their patients from contracting infections while in the hospital,” according to healthcare columnist David Burda in an article he penned for 4Sight Health titled, “Hospital Infection Regression.”
Clinical laboratory testing is part of a concerted effort in the US to reduce HAIs in acute care hospitals. Additionally, diagnostic testing is vital to antimicrobial stewardship, which is designed to help physicians prescribe to patients only those antibiotics that are appropriate and reduce the chance for antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
So, it’s disturbing to see a setback in both HAIs and antimicrobial stewardship in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Burda called the CDC’s findings a “regression” that “gives new meaning to the term long COVID.”
“I think, without any proof, doctors, nurses, medical technicians, and other clinicians who provide direct patient care regressed in terms of infection control best practices,” wrote healthcare journalist David Burda in his column for 4Sight Health. Clinical laboratories that processed COVID-19 tests during the pandemic can attest to the burnout. (Photo copyright: 4Sight Health.)
CDC Report Reveals Increase in Hospital Acquired Infections
The CDC used standardized infection ratios (SIRs) in its report to detail changes in nosocomial infections. CDC calculates SIRs by dividing the number of observed infections by the number of predicted infections.
“In 2021, the nation and the world continued to experience unprecedented challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which impacted surveillance for and incidence of HAIs,” the CDC explained in its report.
“Compared to pre-pandemic years, hospitals across the nation experienced higher than usual hospitalizations and shortages in healthcare personnel and equipment, which may have resulted in deterioration in multiple patient safety metrics since the beginning of the pandemic,” the CDC added.
In his 4Sight Health article, Burda noted that physicians and other care providers may have “regressed” in their infection control practices due to severe pressures during the COVID-19 pandemic. “I also think the traveling nurse and temporary staff situation had something to do with it. Who has time to learn or follow the infection control policies and protocols at every hospital when you’re moving from one hospital to the next every few weeks?” he added.
The CDC explored HAIs in acute care hospitals, critical access hospitals, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, and long-term acute care hospitals. According to the federal agency’s report, at acute care hospitals, increases in nosocomial infections from 2020 to 2021 include the following:
- 14% rise in MRSA bloodstream events.
- 12% rise in ventilator-associated events (VAE).
- 11% rise in abdominal hysterectomy surgical site infections (SSI).
- 7% rise in central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI).
- 5% rise in catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI).
On a positive note, the report noted these findings as well:
- 3% decline in hospital onset Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections.
- No significant change in colon surgery SSIs.
In its review of state-level data, CDC noted:
- 27 states performed better on at least two types of infection.
- 30 states performed worse on at least two infection types.
In response to the CDC’s report, the American Hospital Association (AHA) wrote, “In acute care hospitals, the increases seen in some HAIs in 2021 contrast with the success in reducing these infections prior to the pandemic. Despite the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, acute care hospitals performed significantly better than the 2015 national baseline in preventing CLABSI, CAUTI, SSIs following colon surgeries, and C. difficile infections.”
The AHA recommended that hospitals “continue to reinforce prevention practices and review HAI surveillance data to identify areas for improvement.”
Dangers of Antimicrobial Resistance
According to CDC data, in the US there are 2.8 million antimicrobial infections each year, and more than 35,000 people die as a result. Dark Daily has reported extensively on the growing danger of antibiotic resistance and outlined the importance of clinical laboratory involvement in hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs.
In “During Pandemic, Clinical Laboratories Should Be Alert for Drug Resistant Infections That Pose High Risk to COVID-19 Patients,” we covered a study conducted at the University of Minnesota which highlighted the continuing need for microbiologists and clinical laboratories to stay alert for COVID-19 patients with drug-resistant infections following a CDC report on 941 confirmed and probable Candida auris cases that had been reported in 13 states, with an additional 1,830 patients that had been found to be colonized with the multidrug-resistant fungus.
And in “Leapfrog Group Report Shows Hospitals Failing to Eliminate Hospital-Acquired Infections; Medical Laboratories Can Help Providers’ Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs,” we wrote about how healthcare leaders were concerned about a Leapfrog Group report that indicated hospitals are finding it increasingly difficult to completely remove infections. The report states that the number of hospitals reporting zero infections has declined significantly since 2015.
New Joint Commission Antibiotic Standards
The Joint Commission’s expansion of antibiotic stewardship standards, which went into effect on January 1, 2023, could help hospitals reduce nosocomial infections and fight antimicrobial resistance.
“The updated standards come at a vital time. Data shows that the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in increased antibiotic use and a backslide in stewardship efforts,” wrote David Hyun, MD, Antibiotic Resistance Project Director of the Pew Charitable Trusts, in an article he penned for PEW titled, “Expanded Antibiotic Stewardship Standards for Hospitals Will Help Combat Superbugs.”
Pew conducted research related to the requirements and found “significant room for improvement in adoption and implementation of stewardship practices” in acute care hospitals, Hyun wrote.
The Joint Commission’s new and revised requirements for antibiotic stewardship for hospitals include:
- Allocate financial resources for staffing and IT to support the antimicrobial stewardship program.
- Implement evidence-based guidelines to improve antibiotic use for infections such as urinary tract c. diff. community-acquired pneumonia.
- Evaluate the program using evidenced-based criteria.
“New antibiotic stewardship standards should help limit the emergence and spread of new drug-resistant superbugs,” Hyun noted.
Clinical Laboratories Need to Deepen Involvement
By testing patients and quickly reporting results to physicians, hospital-based and independent medical laboratories play an important role in appropriate antibiotic use and elimination of HAIs.
Heightened involvement by microbiologists and other medical laboratory professionals is key to success in light of recent setbacks in elimination of HAIs and antimicrobial resistance due to the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.
—Donna Marie Pocius
Related Information:
2021 National and State Healthcare-Associated Infections Progress Report
CDC Reports Increase in Certain Healthcare Associated Infections in 2021
Drug Resistance National Estimates
R3 Report: Requirement, Rationale, Reference—New and Revised Requirements for Antibiotic Stewardship
Best Buy Health and Atrium Health Collaborate on a Hospital-at-Home Program, Leveraging the Electronics Retailer’s ‘Specially Trained’ Geek Squad, Omnichannel Expertise
Hospital-at-home programs like that of Atrium Health are a trend that may create new opportunities for local clinical laboratories to support physicians treating patients in the comfort of their own homes
Here is a deal that shows the hospital-at-home (HaH) movement is gaining momentum, a trend that clinical laboratories need to recognize for the opportunities it represents. Best Buy Health is partnering with 40-hospital Atrium Health in an HaH program that the healthcare system plans to scale nationally.
This newly-announced collaboration means that Charlotte, North Carolina-based Atrium Health—as partner—may include the hospitals and providers that are part of the 26-hospital Advocate Aurora Health system (now known as Advocate Health), a non-profit healthcare system that Atrium merged with in December of 2022. Providers and hospitals from North/South Carolina, Georgia, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio all could be participating in the new HaH venture.
This latest partnership between a retail giant and healthcare network demonstrates how innovation is working its way into the US healthcare system via companies not traditionally involved in direct patient care. These two organizations see an opportunity to combine their strengths to “enhance the patient experience of receiving hospital-level care at home,” according to a Best Buy news release.
“This is the coming together of technology and empathy,” said Rasu Shrestha, MD (above), Executive Vice President and Chief Innovation and Commercialization Officer at Advocate Health, in a press release. “We’re able to leverage the power of social workers, paramedics, nurses and physicians, but also technology to take care of the patients in their homes. We can bring forward things like remote patient monitoring and sophisticated wearable devices that capture their vital signs and combine it with the human touch—bringing it directly into our patients’ homes.” Clinical laboratories that support providers in the states Advocate Health serves may want to contact Best Buy Health. (Photo copyright: Advocate Health.)
Dispatching Geek Squads to Support Telehealth in Patients’ Homes
Best Buy Health brings to its collaboration with Atrium Health expertise in omnichannel business strategies, supply chain, and a platform to enable telehealth connectivity between patients and providers, as well as deploying specially trained Geek Squad agents for in-home support, according to an Atrium Health press release.
“With Atrium Health, we want to help enable healthcare at home for everyone. It’s getting the devices to the home when Atrium Health and the patient needs them,” said Deborah Di Sanzo, President of Best Buy Health.
Atrium Health sees Best Buy Health as a partner that can grow its program while addressing complex in-home technology that can be “tricky” to operate, Retail Dive reported.
“This transition that happens from discharging a patient from a hospital to the void of their home is the dark side of the moon: it’s disconnected, confusing, expensive. What we’ve been doing in the past is working through our hospital-at-home program and putting together a lot of these devices,” Rasu Shrestha, MD, Executive Vice President and Chief Innovation and Commercialization Officer at Advocate Health, told Fierce Healthcare.
“By working with Best Buy Health, we’re developing the seamless connected care experience and an opportunity to truly scale this,” he added.
Supporting hospital-at-home services in collaboration with Atrium Health will be a new role for at least some members of the Geek Squad. “They won’t necessarily be the same team that’s doing your home theater. They will be Geek Squad agents specially trained in health to deliver specific services in the home,” said Deborah Di Sanzo, President of Best Buy Health. (Photo copyright: Best Buy.)
Best Buy’s Healthcare Acquisitions and Growth in Hospital-at-Home Programs
In making its commitment to healthcare, Best Buy Health recently acquired companies in remote patient monitoring, medical alert services, and telehealth.
The electronics retailer’s acquisitions, according to Fierce Healthcare, include:
- GreatCall (now known as Lively), maker of health and safety products, in 2018.
- Critical Signal Technologies, developer of remote monitoring technologies, in 2019.
- TytoCare, a telehealth device company, in 2019.
- Current Health, a remote monitoring care-at-home platform, in 2021.
While Best Buy was busy acquiring healthcare companies, more HaH programs popped up across the US due in part to rising inpatient costs and providers’ need to be more efficient and resourceful.
Atrium Health started its Hospital-at-Home program in March 2020 as a way to care for COVID-19 patients. The HaH program now serves people with:
- Cardiac conditions,
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD),
- Pneumonia,
- Asthma,
- Infections, and
- Other medical and post-operative needs.
According to Healthcare Dive, Shrestha claimed Atrium’s HaH program “has served more than 6,300 patients and freed 25,000 hospital bed days since it launched in March 2020,” and produced clinical outcomes that were “the same or better” when compared to the health systems’ own hospitals, and with higher patient satisfaction scores.
“We anticipate the partnership will combine Atrium Health operational and clinical expertise with Best Buy Health’s technical and logistical expertise to allow us to scale the program to 100 patients at a time and beyond within our market,” Shrestha told Healthcare Dive. “When you put that into context, this would be the equivalent of having an additional mid-sized hospital and have a real impact on capacity in our bricks-and-mortar facilities.”
Taking Atrium’s HaH Program Nationwide
According to federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services predictions, healthcare spending will reach $6.8 trillion by 2030. This might explain why Best Buy increased its investment in healthcare at the same time its sales declined 9.3% in the fourth quarter of 2022 amid softening consumer demand for electronics, Reuters reported.
And, according to Forbes, though financial terms on the Best Buy/Atrium Health partnership were not released, additional investments are planned to “scale [Atrium’s HaH program] beyond the system.”
“We combine our omnichannel, Geek Squad, caring centers, and Current Health services to enable care,” Di Sanzo told Forbes. “At scale, no other company has the holistic combination of resources that when combined, will change the lives of consumers and enable them to heal right in their own home surrounding by the people and things they love the most. Those strengths, combined with Atrium Health’s extensive clinical expertise and deep experience leading in virtual care, will help us improve and enable care in the home for everyone.”
Clinical Laboratory Testing at Home
Clearly there are opportunities for clinical laboratories to support providers who treat patients in their homes. Lab leaders may want to reach out to colleagues who are planning HaH programs in partnership with Best Buy Health, Atrium Health, or other companies around the nation launching similar hospital-at-home programs.
As medical laboratories address staffing challenges, HaH strategies for performing blood tests and other diagnostics on patients in their homes could lead to important new revenue.
—Donna Marie Pocius
Related Information:
Atrium Health and Best Buy Health Partner to Improve Experience When Receiving Care at Home
Atrium Health and Best Buy Health Partner to Enhance Hospital-at-Home Experience
Atrium, Best Buy Partner to Co-Develop Hospital-at-Home Programming
Hospital-at-Home Steps Out of the COVID-Era Through New Atrium Health, Best Buy Partnership
Best Buy Pushes Deeper into Healthcare with Hospital-at-Home Partnership
Atrium Health, Best Buy Ink Hospital-at-Home Deal
Best Buy, Walmart, Other Major US Retailers Tout Health Services
CMS Office of the Actuary Releases 2021-2030 Projections National Health Expenditures
Orlando Health’s New Hospital-in-the-Home Program Brings Quality Healthcare to Patients in the Comfort of their Homes
New federal funds likely to spark additional growth in hospital-at-home programs across the US while creating need for clinical laboratories to serve these homebound patients
In one of the latest examples of health systems’ providing acute care to patients outside of traditional hospital settings, Orlando Health announced its launch of the Orlando Health Hospital Care at Home program serving central Florida.
Clinical laboratory testing is included in the program, which is currently being offered to Medicare and Medicaid patients of Orlando Regional Medical Center and Orlando Health South Seminole Hospital.
According to an Orlando Health press release, “The Orlando Health program is the first in Central Florida to be approved for Medicare and Medicaid patients, with future plans to expand the service for patients with private insurance and at other Orlando Health locations. It is an extension of a federal initiative created during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic to increase hospital capacity and maximize resources.”
Orlando Health is a not-for-profit healthcare system with 3,200 beds at 23 hospitals and emergency departments. It is the fourth largest employer in Central Florida with 4,500 physicians and 23,000 employees. Its Hospital Care at Home program serves patients who meet clinical criteria with 24/7 telehealth remote monitoring and virtual care from the Orlando Health Patient Care Hub. In-person nursing visits are also offered daily, according to Orlando Health.
“Orlando Health wanted to be able to provide a different level of care for its patients and give them a different opportunity to be cared for other than the brick-and-mortar of the hospital,” Linda Fitzpatrick (above), Assistant Vice President for Advanced Care at Orlando Health told Health News Florida. “We’ll have decreased infectious rates in their homes, decreased exposures. It is a healthier and happier place to be in order to heal.” Clinical laboratories in the Orlando area will have the opportunity to serve healthcare providers diagnosing patients in non-traditional healthcare settings. (Photo copyright: Orlando Sentinel.)
Lowering Costs and Avoiding In-hospital Infections, Medical Errors
Treating patients at home, even after inpatient visits, can save them money. At the same time, patients are more comfortable in their own homes and that contributes to faster recoveries.
“[We’ll be able to measure] heart rate, respiration, temperature, and blood pressure. We’ll also do video conferencing from that location with the patient. We’ll have nurses going to the patient’s home at least twice a day,” interventional cardiologist Rajesh Arvind Shah, MD, Senior Medical Director of Hospital Care at Home, Orlando Health, told Health News Florida.
Orlando Health patients can be safely treated in their homes for many conditions including:
- Cellulitis,
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD),
- Asthma,
- Urinary tract infection,
- Heart failure,
- COVID-19 infection,
- Pneumonia, and
- Gastroenteritis.
According to the American Hospital Association (AHA), “many are seeing the hospital-at-home model as a promising approach to improve value. … This care delivery model has been shown to reduce costs, improve outcomes, and enhance the patient experience. In November 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services launched the Acute Hospital Care at Home program to provide hospitals expanded flexibility to care for patients in their homes.”
Hospital-in-the-Home (HITH) is considered by many experts to be safer for patients, as they are not exposed to nosocomial (hospital-acquired) infections, falls, and medical errors. In its landmark “To Err is Human” report of 1999, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) estimated that medical errors killed as many as 98,000 patients in hospitals annually.
Dark Daily has often reported on HITH programs.
In “Hospital-in-the-Home Shows Promise for Reducing Acute Care Costs; Medical Laboratories Face Uncertainties Concerning Expanding Services to In-Home Environments in Support of Care Providers,” we reported how doctors at Brigham and Women’s Faulkner Hospital in Boston had chosen to treat a 71-year-old pneumonia patient with a weakened immune system in her home rather than admitting her into the hospital and risking exposing her to germs and infection vectors. The patient recovered fully within days.
In “Two US Studies Show Home-based Hospital Care Lowers Costs while Improving Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction,” Dark Daily reported on a year-long proof-of-concept trial involving 323 patients at Presbyterian Healthcare Services in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The study found patients of their hospital-based home care program achieved savings of 19% when compared to costs of similar hospital acute care patients.
And in “Australia’s Hospital-in-the-Home Care Model Demonstrates Major Cost Savings and Comparable Patient Outcomes,” we predicted that wider adoption of that country’s HITH model of patient care would directly affect pathologists and clinical laboratory managers who worked in Australia’s hospital laboratories. Having more HITH patients would increase the need to collect specimens in patient’s homes and transport them to a local clinical laboratory for testing, and, because they are central to the communities they serve, hospital-based medical laboratories would be well-positioned to provide this diagnostic testing.
New Federal Funds for HITH Programs
One recent impetus to create new HITH programs was the passing of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (HR 2617). The federal bill includes two-year extensions of the telehealth waivers and Acute Hospital Care at Home (AHCaH) individual waiver that got started during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As of March 20, the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) listed 123 healthcare systems and 277 hospitals in 37 states that had been approved to use the AHCaH wavier.
Now that federal funding for AHCaH waivers has been extended, more healthcare providers will likely start or expand existing HITH programs.
“I think [the renewed funding] is going to allow for additional programs to come online,” Stephen Parodi, MD, Executive Vice President External Affairs, Communications, and Brand, Permanente Federation; and Associate Executive Director, Permanente Medical Group, told Home Health Care News.
“For the next two years, there’s going to be a regulatory framework and approval for being able to move forward. It allows for the collection of more data, more information on quality, safety, and efficiency of these existing programs,” he added. Parodi also oversees Kaiser Permanente’s Care at Home program.
Labs without Walls
Clinical laboratories can play a major role in supporting HITH patients who require timely medical test results to manage health conditions and hospital recovery. Lab leaders may want to reach out to colleagues who are planning or expanding HITH programs now that federal funding has been renewed.
—Donna Marie Pocius
Related Information:
Where Hospital-at-Home Programs Go Next
Orlando Health Launches Hospital Care at Home Program
Some of Orlando Health’s Patients Can Now Receive Hospital Care at Home
How AI, Digital Health, and Home-Based Services Can Help Prevent Hospital Readmission
CMS: Acute Hospital Care at Home Individual Waiver Only (not a blanket waiver)
CMS: Approved Facilities/Systems for Acute Hospital Care at Home
Pew Charitable Trusts and CDC Find Hospitals Are Overusing Antibiotics, Set New Targets for Antibiotic Prescribing and Avoiding Antimicrobial Resistance
Clinical laboratories and microbiology tests provide key tools for physicians engaged in antibiotic stewardship programs
One important and continuing trend in healthcare is the need for hospitals, nursing homes, and other medical providers to introduce effective antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs). The findings of a recent study on antibiotic stewardship emphasize the need for improvement and suggest guidelines that will involve and engage clinical laboratories.
Antibiotic-resistant infections kill at least 35,000 people in hospitals each year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). And that, the CDC notes, is out of 2.8 million drug-resistant infections that occur annually.
In a recent brief of a study The Pew Charitable Trusts (Pew) conducted with the CDC and various public health and medical experts, Pew wrote, “Minimizing inappropriate antibiotic use in hospitals is a vital element in the fight against antibiotic resistance because more than half of patients admitted to hospitals will receive these drugs. Determining how much antibiotic prescribing is inappropriate and setting national targets to reduce such use are necessary steps for guiding clinical efforts and policies that promote improved antibiotic use.”
To do this, and Pew and the CDC are suggesting “widespread adoption of effective antibiotic stewardship programs, which promote responsible antibiotic prescribing, in order to minimize the harmful effects of inappropriate or unnecessary antibiotic use for patients and slow the spread of resistance.”
And because clinical laboratories perform all the in-hospital testing for ASPs, they will be big part of this effort.
Pew/CDC Set New National Targets for Antibiotic Use Improvement
The Pew brief states that in 2018 the researchers began “to evaluate antibiotic use in hospitals and set national targets to improve prescribing.” The brief adds that “Because of the complexity and diversity of illnesses among hospitalized patients, and the limitations on available clinical data for all antibiotic use in hospitals, the panel focused its analysis on four categories of prescribing that account for the most common antibiotic therapies in US hospitals. Using national prescribing data, the experts examined the use of two types of antibiotics—vancomycin and fluoroquinolones—and antibiotic treatments associated with two conditions: community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and hospital-acquired urinary tract infection (UTI).”
It their paper published in JAMA Network Open, titled, “Assessment of the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Use in US Hospitals,” the Pew/CDC researchers wrote, “In this cross-sectional study of 1,566 patients at 192 hospitals, antimicrobial use deviated from recommended practices for 55.9% of patients who received antimicrobials for community-acquired pneumonia or urinary tract infection present at admission or who received fluoroquinolone or intravenous vancomycin treatment.”
Infection Control Today reported that the CDC and Pew set the following goals for hospitals, but did not give a deadline for improvement:
- Decrease antibiotic inappropriate prescribing in CAP and UTI cases by 90%.
- Decrease overprescribing of fluoroquinolones and vancomycin by 95%.
“Meeting these national reduction targets will require widespread adoption of effective antibiotic stewardship programs, which promote responsible antibiotic prescribing in order to minimize the harmful effects of inappropriate or unnecessary antibiotic use for patients and slow the spread of resistance,” noted the Pew brief, which also pointed out that hospitals should provide incentives to report antibiotic use and impact of stewardship programs to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).
‘Ample Room for Improvement’
The Pew/CDC panel of experts analyzed hospitalized patient data from August 2017 through May 2020. Of those patients, the researchers found that:
- 219 had CAPs,
- 452 had UTIs,
- 550 had received fluoroquinolones, and
- 403 had received vancomycin.
They also found that:
- 56% of antibiotic prescriptions were wrong in the type of antibiotic, how long it was used, or why it was chosen.
- 79% of antibiotic prescriptions for CAP were inappropriate.
- 77% of antibiotic prescriptions did not suit UTI patients.
- 47% of fluoroquinolone prescriptions were unsupported.
- 27% of vancomycin prescriptions were amiss.
The researchers concluded that providers have “ample room for improvement,” the Pew brief notes.
“A substantial percentage of CAP, UTI, fluoroquinolone, and vancomycin treatment was unsupported by medical record data collected (55.9% overall and as high as 79.5% for CAP),” the researchers wrote in their published study.
Pew/CDC Researchers Find Many Antibiotic Prescription Errors
According to the Pew/CDC researchers, missteps in antibiotic usage include:
- Treating inpatients too long with antibiotics.
- Selecting antimicrobials inconsistent with guidelines.
- Absence of signs and symptoms of infection.
- Lack of clinical laboratory tests or microbiologic evidence of infection.
The study revealed antibiotic duration errors were most prevalent in the CAP patients, some being treated with antibiotics for more than seven days.
“Almost 60% of the inappropriate prescribing is attributed to exceeding the recommended seven days of treatment, and the use of the wrong antibiotic accounts for most of the remaining inappropriate (CAP) cases,” the Pew brief explained.
Antibiotics Prescribed without Evidence of Infection
As medical laboratory professionals know, microbiology tests identify presence and type of bacteria in urine. But the Pew/CDC researchers reported they found UTI cases that lacked evidence of infection.
“In most instances—where antibiotic use was not supported—the antibiotics were prescribed to patients who lacked symptoms or microbiology test results consistent with UTIs,” according to their report.
Antibiotics Overprescribed to COVID-19 Patients
Another study conducted by The Pew Charitable Trusts “assessed the frequency of bacterial infections and antibiotic prescribing patterns in hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in the US.” The researchers, according to the Pew brief on that study, titled, “Could Efforts to Fight the Coronavirus Lead to Overuse of Antibiotics?” used “IBM Watson Health’s electronic health records [EHR] database to capture data about approximately 5,000 patients and nearly 6,000 hospital admissions from February through July 2020.”
The researchers of that study found potential antibiotic misuse among COVID-19 patients as well.
- 52% received at least one antibiotic prescription.
- 36% had multiple antibiotics.
- 96% were treated with antibiotics within 48 hours of admission and likely before infection was confirmed.
Clinical Laboratories are Key Partners
Hospital-based clinical laboratory leaders may want to contact physicians and infection control colleagues and work toward correcting use of antibiotics in patient care. And microbiologists are advised to aggressively communicate available medical laboratory test data about UTI infections, which the Pew/CDC study suggests can be missed.
Medical laboratories provide testing to diagnose infections and to identify strains of infectious agents that may be antibiotic-resistant. Therefore, lab leaders will be key partners in hospitals’ efforts to reduce infections and prevent antibiotic resistance.
—Donna Marie Pocius
Related Information:
Health Experts Establish Targets to Improve Hospital Antibiotic Prescribing
Assessment of the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Use in U.S. Hospitals
CDC Wants to Improve Antibiotic Overprescribing by Over 90%
National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)
Could Efforts to Fight the Coronavirus Lead to Overuse of Antibiotics?
Antibiotics Significantly Overprescribed During Early Months of Pandemic, Study Suggests
