News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel

News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel
Sign In

Doctors in India Sound Alarm: CRE Infections are Becoming Common in India and Killing Two-Thirds of Patients Who Contract Them While Undergoing Cancer Treatment!

As infectious bacteria become even more resistant to antibiotics, chronic disease patients with weakened immune systems are in particular danger

Microbiologists and clinical laboratory managers in the United States may find it useful to learn that exceptionally virulent strains of bacteria are causing increasing numbers of cancer patient deaths in India. Given the speed with which infectious diseases spread throughout the world, it’s not surprising that deaths due to similar hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are increasing in the US as well.

Recent news reporting indicates that an ever-growing number of cancer patients in the world’s second most populous nation are struggling to survive these infections while undergoing chemotherapy and other treatments for their cancers.

In some ways, this situation is the result of more powerful antibiotics. Today’s modern antibiotics help physicians, pathologists, and clinical laboratories protect patients from infectious disease. However, it’s a tragic fact that those same powerful drugs are making patients with chronic diseases, such as cancer, more susceptible to death from HAIs caused by bacteria that are becoming increasingly resistant to those same antibiotics.

India is a prime example of that devastating dichotomy. Bloomberg reported that a study conducted by Abdul Ghafur, MD, an infectious disease physician with Apollo Hospitals in Chennai, India, et al, concluded that “Almost two-thirds of cancer patients with a carbapenem-resistant infection are dead within four weeks, vs. a 28-day mortality rate of 38% in patients whose infections are curable.”

This news should serve as an alert to pathologists, microbiologists, and clinical laboratory leaders in the US as these same superbugs—which resist not only antibiotics but other drugs as well—may become more prevalent in this country.

 ‘We Don’t Know What to Do’

The dire challenge facing India’s cancer patients is due to escalating bloodstream infections associated with carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE), a particularly deadly bacteria that has become resistant to even the most potent carbapenem antibiotics, generally considered drugs of last resort for dealing with life-threatening infections.

Lately, the problem has only escalated. “We are facing a difficult scenario—to give chemotherapy and cure the cancer and get a drug-resistant infection and the patient dying of infections.” Ghafur told Bloomberg. “We don’t know what to do. The world doesn’t know what to do in this scenario.”

Ghafur added, “However wonderful the developments in the field of oncology, they are not going to be useful, because we know cancer patients die of infections.”

Abdul Ghafur, MD (above), an infectious disease physician with Apollo Hospitals in Chennai, India, told The Better India that, “Indians, are obsessed with antibiotics and believe that they can cure almost all infections, including viral infections! Moreover, at least half of the prescriptions by Indian doctors include an antibiotic. Sadly, the public believes that whenever we get cold and cough, we need to swallow antibiotics for three days along with paracetamol [acetaminophen]! This is a myth that urgently needs to disappear!” (Photo copyright: Longitude Prize.)

The problem in India, Bloomberg reports, is exacerbated by contaminated food and water. “Germs acquired through ingesting contaminated food and water become part of the normal gut microbiome, but they can turn deadly if they escape the bowel and infect the urinary tract, blood, and other tissues.” And chemotherapy patients, who likely have weakened digestive tracts, suffer most when the deadly germs reach the urinary tract, blood, and surrounding tissues.

“Ten years ago, carbapenem-resistant superbug infections were rare. Now, infections such as carbapenem-resistant klebsiella bloodstream infection, urinary infection, pneumonia, and surgical site infections are a day-to-day problem in our (Indian) hospitals. Even healthy adults in the community may carry these bacteria in their gut in Indian metropolitan cities; up to 5% of people carry these superbugs in their intestines,” Ghafur told The Better India.

What are CRE and Why Are They So Deadly?

CRE are part of the enterobacteriaceae bacterial family, which also includes Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Klebsiella pneumoniae. CRE, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), are considered “antibiotic-resistant” because antibiotic agents known as carbapenems are becoming increasing less effective at treating enterobacteriaceae.

In fact, a 2018 study conducted by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) in New Delhi, which was published in the Journal of Global Infectious Diseases (JGID), found that bloodstream infections due to CRE were the “leading cause” of illness and death in patients with hematological malignancies, such as leukemia.

“These patients receive chemotherapy during treatment, which lead to severe mucositis of gastrointestinal tract and myelosuppression. It was hypothesized that the gut colonizer translocate into blood circulation causing [bloodstream infection],” the AIIMS paper states.

US Cases of C. auris Also Linked to CRE

Deaths in the US involving the fungus Candida auris (C. auris) have been linked to CRE as well. And, people who were hospitalized outside the US may be at particular risk.

The CDC reported on a Maryland resident who was hospitalized in Kenya with a carbapenemase-producing infection, which was later diagnosed as C. auris. The CDC describes C. auris as “an emerging drug-resistant yeast of high public concern … C auris frequently co-occurs with carbapenemase-producing organisms like CRE.”

The graphic above, developed by the NYT from CDC data, shows that Candida auris is found globally and not restricted to poor or resource-strapped nations. “The fungus seems to have emerged in several locations at once, not from a single source,” the NYT reports. This means clinical laboratories can expect to be processing more tests to identify the deadly fungus. (Graphic copyright: New York Times/CDC.)

Drug-resistant germs are a public health threat that has grown beyond overuse of antibiotics to an “explosion of resistant fungi,” reported the New York Times (NYT).

“It’s an enormous problem. We depend on being able to treat those patients with antifungals,” Matthew Fisher, PhD, Professor of Fungal Disease Epidemiology at Imperial College London, told the NYT

The NYT article states that “Nearly half of patients who contract C. auris die within 90 days, according to the CDC. Yet the world’s experts have not nailed down where it came from in the first place.”

Cases of C. auris in the US are showing up in New York, New Jersey, and Illinois and is arriving on travelers from many countries, including India, Pakistan, South Africa, Spain, United Kingdom, and Venezuela.  

“It is a creature from the black lagoon,” Tom Chiller, MD, Chief of the Mycotic Diseases Branch at the CDC told the NYT. “It bubbled up and now it is everywhere.”

Since antibiotics are used heavily in agriculture and farming worldwide, the numbers of antibiotic-resistant infections will likely increase. Things may get worse, before they get better.

Pathologists, microbiologists, oncologists, and clinical laboratories involved in caring for patients with antibiotic-resistant infections will want to fully understand the dangers involved, not just to patients, but to healthcare workers as well.

—Donna Marie Pocius

Related Information:

Superbugs Deadlier than Cancer Put Chemotherapy into Question

Taking Antibiotics for a Viral Infection? A Doc Shares Why You Should Think Twice

Healthcare-Associated Infections: CRE

Rectal Carriage of Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae: A Menace to Highly Vulnerable Patients

Clinical Study of Carbapenem Sensitive and Resistant Gram-negative Bacteria in Neutropenic and Nonneutropenic Patients: The First Series from India

Candida Auris in a U.S. Patient with Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms and Recent Hospitalization in Kenya

Deadly Germs, Lost Cures: A Mysterious Infection, Spanning the Globe in a Climate of Secrecy

University of Edinburgh Study Finds Antimicrobial Bacteria in Hospital Wastewater in Research That Has Implications for Microbiologists

Pathologists and Clinical Laboratories to Play Critical Role in Developing New Tools to Fight Antibiotic Resistance

Lurking Below: NIH Study Reveals Surprising New Source of Antibiotic Resistance That Will Interest Microbiologists and Medical Laboratory Scientists

Wellcome Sanger Institute Study Discovers New Strain of C. Difficile That Targets Sugar in Hospital Foods and Resists Standard Disinfectants

Researchers believe new findings about genetic changes in C. difficile are a sign that it is becoming more difficult to eradicate

Hospital infection control teams, microbiologists, and clinical laboratory professionals soon may be battling a strain of Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) that is even more resistant to disinfectants and other forms of infection control.

That’s the opinion of research scientists at the Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI) and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) in the United Kingdom who discovered the “genetic changes” in C. difficile. Their genomics study, published in Nature Genetics, shows that the battle against super-bugs could be heating up.

A WSI news release states the researchers “identified genetic changes in the newly-emerging species that allow it to thrive on the Western sugar-rich diet, evade common hospital disinfectants, and spread easily.”

Microbiologists and infectious disease doctors know full well that this means the battle to control HAIs is far from won.

C. difficile is currently forming a new species with one group specialized to spread in hospital environments. This emerging species has existed for thousands of years, but this is the first time anyone has studied C. difficile genomics in this way to identify it. This particular [bacterium] was primed to take advantage of modern healthcare practices and human diets,” said Nitin Kumar, PhD (above), in the news release. (Photo copyright: Wellcome Sanger Institute.) 

Genomic Study Finds New Species of Bacteria Thrive in Western Hospitals

In the published paper, Nitin Kumar, PhD, Senior Bioinformatician at the Wellcome Sanger Institute and Joint First Author of the study, described a need to better understand the formation of the new bacterial species. To do so, the researchers first collected and cultured 906 strains of C. difficile from humans, animals, and the environment. Next, they sequenced each DNA strain. Then, they compared and analyzed all genomes.

The researchers found that “about 70% of the strain collected specifically from hospital patients shared many notable characteristics,” the New York Post (NYPost) reported.

Hospital medical laboratory leaders will be intrigued by the researchers’ conclusion that C. difficile is dividing into two separate species. The new type—dubbed C. difficile clade A—seems to be targeting sugar-laden foods common in Western diets and easily spreads in hospital environments, the study notes. 

“It’s not uncommon for bacteria to evolve, but this time we actually see what factors are responsible for the evolution,” Kumar told Live Science.

New C. Difficile Loves Sugar, Spreads

Researchers found changes in the DNA and ability of the C. difficile clade A to metabolize simple sugars. Common hospital fare, such as “the pudding cups and instant mashed potatoes that define hospital dining are prime targets for these strains”, the NYPost explained.

Indeed, C. difficile clade A does have a sweet tooth. It was associated with infection in mice that were put on a sugary “Western” diet, according to the Daily Mail, which reported the researchers found that “tougher” spores enabled the bacteria to fight disinfectants and were, therefore, likely to spread in healthcare environments and among patients.

“The new C. difficile produces spores that are more resistant and have increased sporulation and host colonization capacity when glucose or fructose is available for metabolism. Thus, we report the formation of an emerging C. difficile species, selected for metabolizing simple dietary sugars and producing high levels or resistant spores, that is adapted for healthcare-mediated transmission,” the researchers wrote in Nature Genetics.

Bacteria Pose Risk to Patients

The findings about the new strains of C. difficile bacteria now taking hold in provider settings are important because hospitalized patients are among those likely to develop life-threatening diarrhea due to infection. In particular, people being treated with antibiotics are vulnerable to hospital-acquired infections, because the drugs eliminate normal gut bacteria that control the spread of C. difficile bacteria, the researchers explained.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), C. difficile causes about a half-million infections in patients annually and 15,000 of those infections lead to deaths in the US each year.

New Hospital Foods and Disinfectants Needed

The WSI/LSHTM study suggests hospital representatives should serve low-sugar diets to patients and purchase stronger disinfectants. 

“We show that strains of C. difficile bacteria have continued to evolve in response to modern diets and healthcare systems and reveal that focusing on diet and looking for new disinfectants could help in the fight against this bacteria,” said Trevor Lawley, PhD, Senior Author and Group Leader of the Lawley Lab at the Wellcome Sanger Institute, in the news release.

Microbiologists, infectious disease physicians, and their associates in nutrition and environmental services can help by understanding and watching development of the new C. difficile species and offering possible therapies and approaches toward prevention.

Meanwhile, clinical laboratories and microbiology labs will want to keep up with research into these new forms of C. difficile, so that they can identify the strains of this bacteria that are more resistant to disinfectants and other infection control methods.  

—Donna Marie Pocius

Related Information:

Adaptation of Host Transmission Cycle During Clostridium Difficile Speciation

Diarrhea-causing Bacteria Adapted to Spread in Hospitals

Sugary Western Diets Fuel Newly Evolving Superbug

New Carb-Loving Superbug is Primed to Target Hospital Food

Superbug C Difficile Evolving to Spread in Hospitals and Feeds on the Sugar-Rich Western Diet

CDC: Healthcare-Associated Infections-C. Difficile  

Federal Advisory Committee Seeks Public Comments on Revising CLIA Regulations, says Keynote Speaker at 13th Annual Lab Quality Confab in Atlanta

At The Dark Report’s annual Lab Quality Confab for clinical laboratory administrators, managers, and quality team members, experts outline how disruption in healthcare requires labs to improve processes and cut costs

ATLANTA, Oct. 15, 2019—Clinical laboratory professionals have a chance to advise the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on how the federal government could revise the regulations under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA). That’s according to one of the keynote speakers on Wednesday at The Dark Report’s 13th Annual Lab Quality Confab (LQC), which began here on Tuesday.

Reynolds M. Salerno, PhD, Director of the Division of Laboratory Systems (DLS) for the CDC in Atlanta, explained that the agency is collecting comments from the public and from its Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory Committee (CLIAC) on how to revise the CLIA regulations.

This is an opportunity for clinical laboratory directors, pathologists, and other lab professionals, to comment on the proposed revisions to CLIA before or during the upcoming CLIAC meeting on Nov. 6.

The agenda for the meeting is posted on the CDC’s website.

Public to be Heard on CLIA Regulations

“For the first time in its 26-year history, the council has called for three workgroups to address how to revise CLIA,” Salerno said. The workgroups will address these topics:

“It’s a dramatic step for the government to ask the laboratory community how to revise the CLIA regulations,” Salerno commented. Chartered in 1992, the advisory council meets twice a year, once in April and once in November.

CLIAC issued a summary report of its April 10-11 meeting. It also published an agenda for its upcoming meeting in Nov. 6.

In the coming weeks, Dark Daily will publish more information on how clinical laboratory professionals can comment on the important issue of CLIA revisions.

Digital slides from Salerno’s keynote address are posted on LQC’s presentations website.

Clinical Laboratory Testing is Increasing in Value, Keynote Speaker Says

As a service to clinical laboratories, Salerno outlined many of the services the CDC’s Division of Laboratory Systems provides for free to clinical labs, including information on such topics as:

During his remarks at the 13th Annual Lab Quality Confab in Atlanta, Salerno had good news for the clinical laboratory professionals in attendance. He said that lab testing was becoming a more valued commodity in healthcare because physicians and other providers were growing increasingly confident in lab test results. [Photo copyright: The Dark Report.]

Healthcare System Disruption Impacts Providers, Including Clinical Laboratories

Other keynote speakers addressed how disruption in the US healthcare systems affects provider organizations in significant ways. For clinical laboratories, such disruption has resulted in reduced payment and demands for quality improvement and shorter turnaround times.

For all these reasons, quality management systems may be every clinical laboratory’s best strategy to survive and thrive, the keynote speakers said.

The first keynoter was Robert L. Michel, Editor-in-Chief and Publisher of The Dark Report. Michel’s remarks focused on how price cuts from Medicare, Medicaid, private payers, and the drive for value-based payment, are requiring labs to do more with less. For this reason, quality management systems are necessary for all labs seeking to improve results, eliminate errors, and cut costs, he said.

“The people closest to the work know how to fix these problems,” he added. “That’s why labs know they must train their staff to identify problems and then report them up the chain so they can be fixed,” Michel commented. “Labs that are best at listening to their employees are getting very good at identifying problems by measuring results and monitoring and reporting on their own performance.”

Michel identified three principle factors that are disrupting healthcare:

  • The shift from reactive care in which the health system cares for sick patients to proactive care in which the health system aims to keep patients healthy and out of the hospital and other costly sites of care.
  • The transition away from fee-for-service payment that encourages providers to do more for patients, whether more care is needed or not, to value-based payment that aims to reward providers for keeping patients healthy.
  • The consolidation among hospitals, health systems, physicians, and other providers. A trend that requires clinical laboratories to find new partners and new ways to improve lab services and reduce costs.

Informatics Performance Data Help Clinical Laboratories Respond to Change

“The attributes of new and successful labs are that they will have faster workflow and shorter cycle times for clinical lab tests and anatomic pathology specimen results,” Michel explained. “That means that labs will attack non-value-added processes by implementing continuous improvement strategies [such as Lean and Six Sigma] and by the sophisticated use of informatics.”

Making use of performance data enables clinical laboratory directors to make changes in response to disruptions that affect healthcare. “If you have good informatics, then seven or eight of every 10 decisions you make will be good decisions, and with the other two and three decisions, you’ll have time to pull back and adjust,” Michel commented.

The second keynote speaker, Jeremy Schubert, MBA, MPH, Division Vice President of Abbott, reiterated what Michel said about how the health system is moving away from fee-for-service payment. Instead of focusing on caring for sick patients exclusively, he said, health insurers are paying all healthcare providers to keep patients healthy.

“Healthcare today is about the whole life course of the individual,” Schubert explained. “Patients no longer want healthcare only when they’re sick. Instead, they want to be healthy. And health creation is not just about a person’s physical health. It’s about their mental health, their emotional health, and their social wellbeing.

“In fact,” he continued, “you can learn more about a person’s health from their Zip code than from their genetic code.”

That is essentially what TriCore Reference Laboratories (TriCore) has been doing in New Mexico, Schubert added. During his presentation, Michel mentioned TriCore as being one of four clinical laboratories participating in Project Santa Fe, a non-profit organization that promotes the movement from Clinical Lab 1.0 to Clinical Lab 2.0. (See “TriCore Forges Ahead to Help Payers Manage Population Health,” The Dark Report, May 20, 2019.)

“If you want to be a quality engine in healthcare you have to be operating at Lab 2.0. Who is best qualified to interpret information? It’s the lab,” Schubert said. Then he challenged labs to begin pursuing the goal of achieving Lab 3.0, saying “Lab 3.0 is being able to interface with the patient to address each patient’s problems.”

The 13th Annual Lab Quality Confab (LQC) in Atlanta continues through the 17th with post-event workshops in Six Sigma and mastering quality management systems. In attendance are 300 clinical laboratory administrators, managers, and quality team members who are learning a complete array of professional training methods.

To register to attend, click here or enter https://www.labqualityconfab.com/register into your browser, or call 707-829-9485, or e-mail lqcreg@amcnetwork.com.

—Joseph Burns

Related Information:

Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory Committee Agenda for meeting Nov. 6

Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory Committee Summary Report

TriCore Forges Ahead to Help Payers Manage Population Health

Helping Medical Laboratories Add Value to Health Systems, Providers, and Payers by Moving from Clinical Lab 1.0 to Clinical Lab 2.0

University of Edinburgh Study Finds Antimicrobial Bacteria in Hospital Wastewater in Research That Has Implications for Microbiologists

The highly infectious bacteria can survive treatment at local sewage plants and enter the food chain of surrounding populations, the study revealed

Researchers at the University of Edinburgh (UE) in Scotland found large amounts of antimicrobial-resistance (AMR) genes in hospital wastewater. These findings will be of interest to microbiologists and clinical laboratory managers, as the scientists used metagenomics to learn “how abundances of AMR genes in hospital wastewater are related to clinical activity.”

The UE study sheds light on the types of bacteria in wastewater that goes down hospital pipes to sewage treatment plants. The study also revealed that not all infectious agents are killed after passing through waste treatment plants. Some bacteria with antimicrobial (or antibiotic) resistance survive to enter local food sources. 

The scientists concluded that the amount of AMR genes found in hospital wastewater was linked to patients’ length-of-stays and consumption of antimicrobial resistant bacteria while in the hospital.

Using Metagenomics to Surveille Hospital Patients

Antimicrobial resistance is creating super bacteria that are linked to increases in hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) nationwide. Dark Daily has reported many times on the growing danger of deadly antimicrobial resistant “super bugs,” which also have been found in hospital ICUs (see “Potentially Fatal Fungus Invades Hospitals and Public Is Not Informed,” August 26, 2019.)

In a paper the University of Edinburgh published on medRxiv, the researchers wrote: “There was a higher abundance of antimicrobial-resistance genes in the hospital wastewater samples when compared to Seafield community sewage works … Sewage treatment does not completely eradicate antimicrobial-resistance genes and thus antimicrobial-resistance genes can enter the food chain through water and the use of [processed] sewage sludge in agriculture. As hospital wastewater contains inpatient bodily waste, we hypothesized that it could be used as a representation of inpatient community carriage of antimicrobial resistance and as such may be a useful surveillance tool.”

Additionally, they wrote, “Using metagenomics to identify the full range of AMR genes in hospital wastewater could represent a useful surveillance tool to monitor hospital AMR gene outflow and guide environmental policy on AMR.”

AMR bacteria also are being spread by human touch throughout city subways, bus terminals, and mass transportation, making it difficult for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to identify the source of the outbreak and track and contain it. This has led microbiologists to conduct similar studies using genetic sequencing to identify ways to track pathogens through city infrastructures and transportation systems. (See, “Microbiologists at Weill Cornell Use Next-Generation Gene Sequencing to Map the Microbiome of New York City Subways,” December 13, 2013.)

Antimicrobial stewardship programs are becoming increasingly critical to preventing the spread of AMR bacteria. “By having those programs, [there are] documented cases of decreased antibiotic resistance within organisms causing these infections,” Paul Fey, PhD, of the University of Nebraska Medical Center, told MedPage Today. “This is another indicator of how all hospitals need to implement stewardship programs to have a good handle on decreasing antibiotic use.” [Photo copyright: University of Nebraska.]

Don’t Waste the Wastewater

Antibiotic resistance occurs when bacteria change in response to medications to prevent and treat bacterial infections, according to a World Health Organization (WHO) fact sheet. The CDC estimates that more than 23,000 people die annually from two million antibiotic-resistance infections.

Wastewater, the UE scientists suggest, should not go to waste. It could be leveraged to improve hospitals’ detection of patients with antimicrobial resistance, as well as to boost environment antimicrobial-resistance polices.

They used metagenomics (the study of genetic material relative to environmental samples) to compare the antimicrobial-resistance genes in hospital wastewater against wastewater from community sewage points. 

The UE researchers:

  • First collected samples over a 24-hour period from various areas in a tertiary hospital;
  • They then obtained community sewage samples from various locations around Seafield, Scotland;
  • Finally, they complete the genetic sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq4000 System.

The researchers reported these findings:

  • 181 clinical isolates were identified in the samples of wastewater;
  • 1,047 unique bacterial genes were detected across all samples;
  • 19 genes made up more than 60% of bacteria in samples;
  • Overriding bacteria identified as Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter environmental samples (Pseudomonas fluorescens and Acinetobacter johnsonii) were most likely from hospital pipes;
  • Gut-related bacteria—Faecalibacterium, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, and Escherichia, were more prevalent in the hospital samples than in those from the community;
  • Antimicrobial-resistance genes increased with longer length of patient stays, which “likely reflects transmission amongst hospital inpatients,” researchers noted. 

Fey suggests that further research into using sequencing technology to monitor patients is warranted.

“I think that monitoring each patient and sequencing their bowel flora is more likely where we’ll be able to see if there’s a significant carriage of antibiotic-resistant organisms,” Fey told MedPage Today. “In five years or so, sequencing could become so cheap that we could monitor every patient like that.”

Fey was not involved in the University of Edinburgh research.

Given the rate at which AMR bacteria spreads, finding antibiotic-resistance genes in hospital wastewater may not be all that surprising. Still, the University of Edinburgh study could lead to cost-effective ways to test the genes of bacteria, which then could enable researchers to explore different sources of infection and determine how bacteria move through the environment.

And, perhaps most important, the study suggests clinical laboratories have many opportunities to help eliminate infections and slow antibiotic resistance. Microbiologists can help move their organizations forward too, along with infection control colleagues.  

—Donna Marie Pocius

Related Information:

Secrets of the Hospital Underbelly: Abundance of Antimicrobial-Resistance Genes in Hospital Wastewater Reflects Hospital Microbial Use and Inpatient Length of Stay

Antibiotic-Resistance Genes Trouble Hospital Water; Study Emphasizes Importance of Antibiotic Stewardship Programs, Expert Says

Fact Sheet: Antibiotic Resistance

United States Gathers 350 Commitments to Combat Antibiotic Resistance, Action Must Continue

Genomic Analysis of Hospital Plumbing Reveals Diverse Reservoir of Bacterial Plasmids Conferring Carbapenemase Resistance

Dark Daily E-briefings: Hospital-Acquired Infections

NIH Study Reveals Surprising New Source of Antibiotic Resistance that Will Interest Microbiologists and Medical Laboratory Scientists

Australia’s HPV Vaccination Program Could Eliminate Cervical Cancer If Its National HPV Vaccination and Screening Programs Remain on Current Pace

CDC estimates that 92% of cancers caused by HPV could be eliminated in the US if HPV vaccination recommendations in this country are followed

Medical laboratories in the United States once processed as many as 55-million Pap tests each year. However, the need for cervical cancer screening tests is diminishing. That’s primarily because the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination effectively eliminates new cases of cervical cancer. At least, that’s what’s happening in Australia.

When it was introduced in 2007, Australia’s nationwide publicly-funded HPV vaccination program only included girls, but was extended to boys in 2013. Today, it is being credited with helping slash the country’s cervical cancer rates.

Research published in The Lancet Public Health (Lancet) predicts cervical cancer could be eliminated in Australia by 2028 if current vaccination rates and screening programs continue. Cervical cancer would be classified as effectively eliminated once there are four or fewer new cases per 100,000 women each year. These developments will be of interests to pathologists and cytotechnologists in the United States.

“From the beginning, I think the [Australian] government successfully positioned the advent of HPV vaccination as a wonderful package that had a beneficial effect for the population,” Karen Canfell, PhD, Director, Cancer Research Division at Cancer Council New South Wales, Australia, and Adjunct Professor, University of Sydney, told the Texas Tribune. “It was celebrated for that reason, and it was a great public health success.”

In addition to high vaccination rates, the Lancet study notes that last year Australia transitioned from cytology-based cervical screening every two years for women aged 18 to 69 years, to primary HPV testing every five years for women aged 25 to 69 and exit testing for women aged 70 to 74 years.

“Large-scale clinical trials and detailed modelling suggest that primary HPV screening is more effective at detecting cervical abnormalities and preventing cervical cancer than screening with cytology at shorter intervals,” the Lancet study states.

The incidence of cervical cancer in Australia now stands at seven cases per 100,000. That’s about half the global average. The country is on pace to see cervical cancer officially considered a “rare” cancer by 2020, when rates are projected to drop to fewer than six new cases per 100,000 women.

US Cervical Cancer Rates

In Texas, meanwhile, the state’s failure to embrace HPV vaccination is being blamed for slowing potential improvements in cervical cancer rates. In 2007, Texas lawmakers rejected legislation that would have mandated girls entering sixth grade be vaccinated for HPV. The Texas Tribune reports that, in the decade that followed, vaccination rates remained stagnant with only about 40% of Texans between 13 and 17 years old having been vaccinated for HPV by 2017.

Though Texas has a similar size population as Australia, the state’s low vaccination rates have meant cervical cancer rates have shown little improvement. Statistics compiled by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) show that Texas’ age-adjusted rate of new cervical cancer cases sits at 9.2 per 100,000 women—unchanged since 2006.

Texas has the fifth highest rate of cervical cancer in the nation, according to the CDC.

Texas State Rep. Jessica Farrar, a Democrat from Houston, maintains Texas should have followed the example of Australia, which in 2007 began a publicly funded HPV vaccination program that has the country on the verge of eliminating cervical cancer by 2028. Texas rejected mandatory HPV vaccinations and now has one of the highest cervical cancer rates in the US. “This is a preventable disease, and we should and can be doing more,” she told the Texas Tribune. “Here we are 12 years later, and look where we could’ve been, but because of certain beliefs, we’re suffering from cancers that could have been avoided.” (Photo copyright: The Texas Tribune.)

Lois Ramondetta, MD, Professor of Gynecologic Oncology at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, told the Texas Tribune the state ignored an opportunity that Australia seized. “[Australia] embraced the vaccine at that time, and our fear kind of began around then,” Ramondetta said. “Really, vaccination in general has just gone down the tube since then.”

CDC Study Pushes HPV Vaccination Recommendations in US

Texas is not the only state failing to capitalize on the HPV vaccine’s cancer-curing promise. The CDC recently stated in a news release announcing a recent study that 92% of cancers caused by HPV could be eliminated if HPV vaccine recommendations were followed. CDC published the study in its Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

HPV is a common virus that is linked to not only cervical cancer but also cancers of the penis, head, and neck, as well as conditions like genital warts. Though the CDC recommends children get the two-dose vaccine at ages 11-12, the study findings indicate that only 51% of teens ages 11 to 17 have received the recommended doses of HPV vaccine, a 2% increase from 2017 to 2018.

“A future without HPV cancers is within reach, but urgent action is needed to improve vaccine coverage rates,” Brett Giroir, MD, Assistant Secretary for Health, US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), stated in the CDC news release. “Increasing HPV vaccination overage to 80% has been and will continue to be a priority initiative for HHS, and we will continue to work with our governmental and private sector partners to make this a reality.”

Can Australia Eliminate Cervical Cancer?

University of Queensland Professor Ian Frazer, MD, who co-authored the Lancet Public Health study, believes Australia is on the verge not only of eliminating cervical cancer, but also eradicating the HPV virus itself.

“Because this human papillomavirus only infects humans, and the vaccine program prevents the spread of the virus, eventually we’ll get rid of it, like we did with smallpox,” Frazer told The Age.

“It’s not going to happen in my lifetime,” he added. “But it could happen in the lifetime of my kids if they go about it the right way.”

If Australia’s combination of high HPV vaccination rates and new HPV screening program succeeds in effectively eliminating cervical cancer, clinical laboratories in this country should expect stepped-up efforts to increase HPV vaccination rates in the United States. A renewed focus on reducing—and ultimately eliminating—cervical cancer, could lead to fewer or less-frequently performed Pap tests as part of cervical cancer screening protocols.

—Andrea Downing Peck

Related Information:

The Projected Timeframe Until Cervical Cancer Elimination in Australia: A Modelling Study

Years after Texas Backed Off HPV Vaccine Mandate, Cervical Cancer Rate Soars

Cervical Cancer Set to Be Eliminated from Australia in Global First

An Estimated 92% of Cancers Caused by HPV Could be Prevented by Vaccine

Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

;