News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel

News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel
Sign In

American Society of Radiology Leaders Identify Seven ‘Most Pressing’ Challenges to Radiology Profession

Managers of pathology groups and clinical laboratories can learn from the challenges confronting the radiology profession

Members of the Intersociety Committee of the American Society of Radiology (ACR) recently met in Coronado, Calif., to discuss the “most pressing” challenges to their profession and investigate possible solutions, according to Radiology Business. Many of these challenges mimic similar challenges faced by anatomic pathology professionals.

The radiology leaders identified seven of the “most important challenges facing radiology today.” They include: declining reimbursement, corporatization and consolidation, inadequate labor force, imaging appropriateness, burnout, turf wars with nonphysicians, and workflow efficiency, according to a report on the meeting published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology (JACR).

“Solving these issues will not be easy,” said Bettina Siewert, MD, diagnostic radiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) in Boston, Mass., professor of radiology at Harvard, and lead author of the JACR report, in the JACR. “This is a collection of ‘wicked’ problems defined as having (1) no stoppable rule, (2) no enumerable set of solutions or well-described set of permissible operations, and (3) stakeholders with very different worldviews and frameworks for understanding the problem,” she added.

“The Intersociety Committee is a freestanding committee of the ACR established to promote collegiality and improve communication among national radiology organizations,” JACR noted.

“Taken together, a ‘perfect storm’ of pressures on radiologists and their institutions is brewing,” said Bettina Siewert, MD (above), diagnostic radiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Mass., professor of radiology at Harvard, and lead author of the JACR report. Wise pathology and clinical laboratory leaders will see the similarities between their industry’s challenges and those facing radiology. (Photo copyright: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.)

How Radiology Challenges Correlate to Pathology Practices

Here are the seven biggest challenges facing radiology practices today as identified by the Intersociety Committee of the ACR.

Declining Reimbursement: According to the ACR report, radiologists in 2021 performed 13% more relative value units (RVUs) per Medicare beneficiary compared to 2005. However, the inflation-adjusted conversion factor fell by almost 34%––this led to a 25% decline in reimbursements.

This issue has plagued the pathology industry as well. According to an article published in the American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP), prior to adjusting for inflation, the average physician reimbursement increased by 9.7% from 2004 to 2024 for all included anatomic pathology CPT codes. After adjusting for inflation, the average physician reimbursement decreased by 34.2% for included CPT codes. The greatest decrease in reimbursement observed from 2004 to 2024 was for outside slide consultation at 60.5% ($330.12 to $130.49), followed by pathology consultation during surgery at 59.0% ($83.54 to $34.29). The average CAGR was -2.19%,” the authors wrote.

“Our study demonstrates that Medicare physician reimbursement for common anatomic pathology procedures is declining annually at an unsustainable rate,” the AJCP authors added.

The radiologists who identified this trend in their own field suggest that medical societies could lead the push to minimize the reimbursement cuts. Pathologists could also adopt this ‘strength in numbers’ mentality to advocate for one another.

Corporatization Consolidation: The authors of the ACR report identified this issue as limiting job opportunities for radiologists particularly in private practice. Pathology professionals have seen the same trend in their field as well. Increasingly, small pathology groups have been consolidated into larger regional groups. Some of those larger regional pathology groups will then be acquired by public laboratory corporations.

The authors of the ACR report suggest radiologists should be educated on the pros and cons of consolidation. They also suggest pursuing unionization.

Inadequate Labor Force: In both radiology and pathology there is a supply-and-demand issue when it comes to labor. Staffing shortages have been felt across all of healthcare, but particularly among pathology groups and clinical laboratories. Siewert and her co-authors suggest a three-pronged approach to address this issue:

  • Creating residency positions in private practice.
  • Recruiting international medical graduates.
  • Increasing job flexibility.

Pathology professionals could apply these same ideas to help close the gap between the open positions in the field and the number of professionals to fill them.

Imaging Appropriateness: A gap between service capacity and service demand for radiology imaging has created a frustrating mismatch between radiologists and clinicians. Radiology experts point to overutilization of the service causing the supply-and-demand crisis. Comparatively, pathologists see a similar issue in complex cases requiring more pathologist time to come to an appropriate diagnosis and identify a care plan.

“To facilitate this reduction, better data on imaging outcomes for specific clinical questions are urgently needed,” the authors of the ACR report wrote as a possible solution. “Considering the magnitude of the mismatch crisis, radiologists may also need to consider expanding their consultative role to include that of a gatekeeper, as is done in other more resource-controlled countries.”

Burnout: Perhaps one of the most talked about subjects in the medical field has been burnout. The issue has been thrust to the forefront with the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the burnout crisis began before the pandemic. About 78% of radiologists surveyed for this report claimed to be exceeding their personal work capacity.

The authors of the ACR report suggest a structured approach to air grievances without descending into despair. “Using a team approach based on the concept of listen-sort-empower, burnout can be combatted by fostering free discussion between frontline workers and radiologists,” they said. “Facilitators unaffiliated with the radiology department can help to maintain focus on gratitude for positive attributes of the work and the institution as well as to keep the sessions on task and prevent them from devolving into complaint sessions with a subsequent loss of hope.”

A similar approach could be applied to pathology groups and clinical laboratory to combat worker burnout as well.

Turf Wars with Nonphysicians: Over the last five years the number of imaging exams being interpreted by nonphysician providers has increased by 30%, according to the ACR report. The writers emphasized the need for increased understanding and awareness about the importance of physician-led care. They suggest solidarity among hospital medical staff to provide a united front in addressing this issue in hospital bylaws.

In pathology, the counterpart is how large physician groups are bringing anatomic pathology in-house. This has been an ongoing trend for the past 20 years. It means that the pathologist is now an employee of the physician group (or a partner/shareholder in some cases).

Increase Workflow Efficiency: Image interpretation accounts for only 36% of the work radiologists perform, the ACR report noted. This issue has a direct counterpart in pathology where compliance requirements and various tasks take time away from pathologist diagnosis. These issues could be solved by working AI into tasks, delegating non-interpretive tasks to other workers, and improving the design of reading rooms. All of these possible solutions could also be applied to clinical pathologists.

These issues being faced by radiologists compare directly to similar issues in the clinical pathology world. Pathologists and pathology group managers would be wise to learn from the experience of their imaging colleagues and possibly adopt some of the ACR’s suggested solutions.

—Ashley Croce

Related Information:

The 7 Most Pressing Challenges in Radiology Practice: A ‘Perfect Storm’ is Brewing

Seven Challenges in Radiology Practice: From Declining Reimbursement to Inadequate Labor Force: Summary of the 2023 ACR Intersociety Meeting

The Decline of Medicare Reimbursement in Clinical Pathology

In Canada, Shortage of Medical Laboratory Technologists and Radiology Technicians Continues to Delay Care

Clinical Laboratory Technician Shares Personal Journey and Experience with Burnout During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Tough Times Ahead for Anatomic Pathology as Group Revenue Declines and Pathologists’ Incomes Drop Due to Payer Price Cuts, Narrow Networks, and Claims Denials

Many pathology groups report shrinking revenue, yet some innovative pathology groups continue to grow through savvy pricing and by adding value to payers and physicians

Times are tough for anatomic pathologists in private practice. Medicare programs and private payers regularly slash prices for both technical component and professional component services. In addition, the growing number of narrow networks means that pathology groups find themselves excluded from access to an ever-larger proportion of patients.

This is not news for the typical anatomic pathologist working in a private practice setting, who today may be making substantially less personal income than just a few years ago. Over the past decade, pathologists have seen multiple assaults to their revenue by client physicians, health insurers, and consumers. (more…)

Attention Pathologists! New Prostate Cancer Test Has CPT Code, NCCN Guideline Recommendation, and Potential Market of One Million Prostate Biopsies Annually

OPKO Health’s 4Kscore test predicts the rate of high-risk prostate cancer and may become a useful business case study for other labs developing proprietary diagnostic tests

Clinical laboratories and biotech companies with new medical laboratory tests are struggling to win coverage by Medicare and private payers. How big is this problem? There are currently tens of thousands of molecular diagnostic assays and genetic tests offered for clinical use.

Any lab company seeking to obtain an appropriate Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code, favorable coverage guidelines, and adequate reimbursement from health insurers for its new lab test faces three big challenges, and they are related. First, payers are simply overwhelmed with requests to review new genetic tests. The flood of new test submissions exceeds the capability of payers to respond.

Most Payers May Not Have Right Scientific Expertise to Evaluate Genetic Tests

Second, most health insurance plans lack physicians and medical professionals who have the necessary experience in laboratory medicine, molecular diagnostics, and genetic medicine to evaluate these lab test submissions in a knowledgeable way. (more…)

;