Jul 21, 2017 | Instruments & Equipment, Laboratory Instruments & Laboratory Equipment, Laboratory Management and Operations, Laboratory Operations, Laboratory Pathology, Laboratory Testing
Pathologists should note that this agreement is not without controversy as the question over who owns patients’ DNA information sparks warnings from legal experts
Did you ever wonder which lab does all the genetic testing for Ancestry as it offers to help consumers learn more about their family histories? Also, were you ever curious about the actual number of genetic tests that Ancestry has generated? After all, its advertisements for these genetic tests are ubiquitous.
You won’t have to wonder any longer, because Dark Daily has the answers. To the first question, it is Quest Diagnostics, Incorporated (NYSE:DGX)—one of the world’s largest clinical laboratory companies—that does the genetic sequencing on the consumer samples provided to it by Ancestry.
To the second question, the number of individual samples in the Ancestry repository and database is now four million, according to information on its website.
AncestryDNA (Ancestry) and Quest Diagnostics (Quest) now collaborate to help consumers learn about their family histories and unlock secrets in their DNA. Since August of 2016, Quest has performed the genomic testing for home DNA kits ordered through Ancestrydna.com. What impact might this have on medical laboratories that perform DNA testing for health and medical reasons?
DNA Testing Reveals Who We Truly Are
“We are very excited to be partnering with Quest Diagnostics to offer our consumer DNA test to more consumers around the world,” stated Tim Sullivan, President and CEO at Ancestry in a news release that announced the genetic testing agreement between the two companies.
To utilize the AncestryDNA service, consumers must first order a DNA kit online through the Ancestry website. The cost of the kit is $99. This includes instructions, a saliva collection tube, and a pre-paid return mailer.
DNA collection kits like the one shown above let people at home do much of the work normally performed in clinical laboratory settings. Though it’s inexpensive compared to standard DNA testing, there is controversy over privacy and ownership of the DNA information. (Photo copyright: BBC/Getty Images.)
After collecting a saliva sample, the customer sends it in for processing. Once the test is completed, an e-mail notification informs the patient that the results can be viewed on AncestryDNA’s website. Typically, a test is completed within six to eight weeks.
The DNA test uses microarray-based autosomal DNA testing, analyzing as many as 700,000 changes in an individual’s genome. These changes (or variations) are called single-nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs for short. They are useful in identifying a person’s true ethnicity and can distinguish possible relatives from among people who have previously taken the AncestryDNA test.
“Our focus is on helping consumers around the world take advantage of the latest technology and science to help them learn more about themselves, their families, and their place in the world,” stated Sullivan in another news release.
Managing One’s Health with DNA Information
As noted earlier, AncestryDNA has collected more than four-million DNA samples. Remarkably, its genetic testing service is currently available in more than 30 countries around the globe, according to Ancestry’s website.
The two companies hope to expand their relationship to include the development of applications to explore valuable medical and health information for consumers.
“People are very interested in their family history, and knowing one’s family health history is very important in helping us manage our health,” noted Stephen Rusckowski, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Quest Diagnostics.
The actual genetic testing is being performed at Quest Diagnostics’ 200,000 square foot facility located in Marlborough, Mass. Quest Diagnostics was chosen for the collaboration after Ancestry requested proposals from several laboratory organizations.
“Adding a second diagnostic partner is a critical step forward as we work to continue to meet the consumer demand we’re seeing for our DNA tests in the US and markets around the world,” stated Ken Chahine, PhD, JD, Executive Vice President at Ancestry and professor at University of Utah S. J. Quinney College of Law in Salt Lake City, in a press release. “We’ll also now be able to move toward an East-West logistical approach, testing kits closer to where our consumers live and, ideally, reducing the time they need to wait to receive their results.”
Concerns Over Patient Privacy and DNA Ownership
Ancestry’s genetic testing program is not without its critics. There are concerns regarding privacy issues and DNA ownership for consumers who use AncestryDNA. Joel Winston, Esq. is a New York attorney who specializes in consumer protection law and commercial litigation. In an article, Winston claimed that Ancestry’s privacy policy and terms of service gave the company complete ownership and control of submitted DNA.
“There are three significant provisions in the AncestryDNA Privacy Policy and Terms of Service to consider on behalf of yourself and your genetic relatives: (1) the perpetual, royalty-free, world-wide license to use your DNA; (2) the warning that DNA information may be used against “you or a genetic relative”; (3) your waiver of legal rights,” Winston wrote.
He claims that Ancestry customers are relinquishing their genetic privacy when they agree to the terms online. Winston urged consumers to fully read, consider, and understand the terms before agreeing to them.
Ancestry responded to the claims by releasing updated terms and conditions for clarity regarding ownership of DNA and information sharing. The company maintains they do not claim ownership rights to DNA submitted to them for testing, and that they do not share DNA testing results with other entities and organizations without customer permission.
In an interview with BBC Radio 4, a spokesperson for Ancestry stated, “We do not share user data for research unless the user has voluntarily opted-in to that sharing.” Adding, “We always de-identify data before it’s shared with researchers, meaning the data is stripped of any information that could tie it back to its owner.”
Nevertheless, Ancestry also stated they would be removing the “perpetuity clause” in AncestryDNA’s online terms and agreements.
The controversy continues and has sparked much debate and reportage from outlets that follow trends in DNA testing and medical laboratories. One such report by the debunking site Snopes attempts to clarify the issues.
Regardless of the debate over ownership of a person’s DNA, this collaboration between Ancestry and Quest Diagnostics is an example of a company relying on diagnostic industry vendors and clinical laboratories to perform services for its customers. It illustrates the need for clinicians and laboratory professionals to remain current on industry trends in ways that might help their labs to increase profits and provide value-added services to consumers. Ancestry’s growing volume of consumer testing demonstrates that there is a potential market for medical laboratories that make themselves available to consumers to answer questions and concerns about DNA testing.
—JP Schlingman
Related Information:
Quest Diagnostics and AncestryDNA Collaborate to Expand Consumer DNA Testing
Ancestry Sets Ancestry DNA Sales Record Over Holiday Period and Fourth Quarter
Clustering of 770,000 Genomes Reveals Post-Colonial Population Structure of North America
Ancestry.com DNA Database Tops 3M, Sales Rise to $850M Ahead of Likely 2017 IPO
Ancestry.com Takes DNA Ownership Rights from Customers and Their Relatives
Setting the Record Straight: Ancestry and Your DNA
Can Ancestry.com Take Ownership of Your DNA Data?
Ancestry.com Denies Exploiting Users’ DNA
Coverage of Alexion Investigation Highlights the Risk to Clinical Laboratories That Sell Blinded Medical Data
Jun 21, 2017 | Compliance, Legal, and Malpractice, Laboratory News, Laboratory Operations, Laboratory Pathology, Laboratory Testing, Management & Operations
Despite blinding data and following protocols, a recent investigation in Bloomberg Businessweek shows that clinical laboratories can be at risk in deals with pharmaceutical and big data companies
While big data is transforming how healthcare is both researched and applied, it also offers opportunities for clinical laboratories to create additional revenue from the endless streams of data generated by diagnostic tests and genetic assays. However, these opportunities come at a cost.
Data mining and pharmaceutical companies are turning to medical laboratories for blinded data (patients’ names are removed) to aid in their research and marketing efforts. Although the data is blinded to adhere to consumer privacy protocols, a story on the biopharmaceutical company Alexion (NASDAQ:ALXN) in Bloomberg Businessweek shows how clinical laboratories may be at risk for civil and legal ramifications, as well as public relation concerns.
When Blinded Patient Data Is Not Blind
Despite requirements to anonymize medical data, the increased computing and data collection abilities of data mining companies make it possible to bridge gaps in information by collating multiple data sources. Companies then can make assumptions about the data with relative accuracy.
With Alexion’s drug Soliris, the blinded data was enough to locate healthcare professionals treating patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), a rare disease of the blood, and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) a rare disease of the immune system.
Cover of the Bloomberg Businessweek issue containing the article on Pharmaceutical companies’ use of blinded patient data for marketing high-cost “orphan drugs” that were developed to treat just one specific rare disease. (Photo copyright: Bloomberg Businessweek.)
On the surface, this seems like an ideal example of how making clinical laboratory and pathology data available to companies can be beneficial to patients and a victory for healthcare.
However, the Bloomberg Businessweek article highlights a darker side of the issue, noting, “Alexion set out to persuade doctors to test more frequently for PNH and aHUS—and to find a way to glimpse these test results, which traditionally have been shared only among the patient, the doctor ordering the test, and the lab.”
Liability and Risk in Age of Big Data
By reaching out to doctors and encouraging them to route lab tests to preferred medical laboratories with which they allegedly had partnered, Alexion could collect information and compare it to their database to pinpoint opportunities to sell their orphan drug Soliris. An orphan drug contains a unique pharmaceutical agent that was developed to treat a specific rare disease.
Five clinical laboratory companies are named in the story. While these laboratories might have followed regulations and the partnerships might be legal, news stories such as these could result in public relations crises and damaged reputations.
According to the Bloomberg Businessweek article, Alexion is resolving legal or regulatory concerns in at least seven countries. Though there is no precedent for medical laboratories assuming liability or being implicated in the crimes of a company to which they sold blinded data, the possibility exists.
Increased Scrutiny as Privacy Becomes a Public Concern
Healthcare big data continues to unlock new opportunities and create new approaches in treating disease and improving health around the world. However, as the public gains awareness of how healthcare big data is collected, shared, and used, greater scrutiny of how the data is handled, and the parties involved, will likely follow.
Dark Daily reported on the balancing act faced by laboratories in a 2016 e-briefing titled, “Trading in Medical Data: Is this a Headache or an Opportunity for Pathologists and Clinical Laboratories?”
That e-briefing cites a Scientific American article in which author Adam Tanner, a fellow at Harvard University’s Institute for Quantitative Social Science, states, “At present, the system is so opaque that many doctors, nurses, and patients are unaware that the information they record or divulge in an electronic health record, or the results from lab tests they request or consent to, may be anonymized and sold.”
In a similar story, Ancestry recently experienced how fast opinions can shift when certain online publications questioned the terms and conditions of the company’s AncestryDNA service. In a matter of days, the service went from an interesting example of consumer genomics to a trending topic on social media.
In the Slate article “Who Owns Your Genetic Data After a Home DNA Test?,” author Jacob Brogan notes, “Even if Ancestry maintains its current commitment to protecting its customers’ data, its willingness to profit from that information may raise red flags for the future of consumer genetic testing.”
While Ancestry might resolve its immediate troubles with an update to its terms of service governing how and when it sells the genetic information of its customers, the hit to the company’s reputation could continue to impact its business. This is something the five clinical lab companies affiliated with Alexion and named in the Bloomberg Businessweek story may be experiencing as well.
As competition increases and clinical laboratories work to cultivate and improve revenue streams and reduce costs, it remains important to stay ahead of trends—and public opinion—by choosing partnerships carefully and remaining transparent about how patient data is collected, shared or sold, and used.
—Jon Stone
Related Information:
When the Patient Is a Gold Mine: The Trouble With Rare-disease Drugs
Your Medical Data Is for Sale, and There’s Nothing You Can Do About It
How Data Brokers Make Money Off Your Medical Records
Who Owns Your Genetic Data After a Home DNA Test?
Jun 16, 2017 | Digital Pathology, Laboratory Management and Operations, Laboratory News, Laboratory Operations, Laboratory Pathology
Pathologists and clinical lab managers can help physicians more effectively select appropriate genetic tests and better interpret results to identify the most appropriate therapies for their patients
Clinical laboratories and pathology groups aren’t the only healthcare providers being scrutinized for cost cutting and workflow efficiencies. Physicians ordering genetic tests are now in the spotlight thanks to a study of genetic test misordering by one healthcare institution.
In her award-winning presentation, “Genetic Testing Costs and Compliance with Clinical Best Practices,” given at the 2016 annual clinical and scientific meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), Kathleen Ruzzo, MD, revealed some startling facts to the attendees. Ruzzo is an obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN) resident at the Naval Medical Center (NMC) in San Diego. She and a team of NMC researchers had reviewed all genetic tests ordered during a 3-month period. They found that more than one-third of the genetic tests examined were unnecessary and had led to more than $20,000 in additional healthcare expenditures. This got the attention of the ACOG, which awarded her 1st prize.
Critical Importance of Staying Informed on Genetic Tests
The researchers examined 114 charts that contained billing codes for genetic tests. They evaluated the charts for compliance with practice guidelines and completed a cost analysis of the tests. The tests were classified per GeneReviews guidelines and were labeled as:
- Appropriate;
- Misordered/Not Indicated;
- Misordered/False Reassurance; or
- Misordered/Inadequate.
GeneReviews is an online database focusing on information, diagnosis, management, and counseling of single-gene disorders. It is published by the National Center for Biotechnology Information.
The researchers found that:
- 44 of the 114 charts examined (39%) were misordered based on the guidelines;
- 24 of the tests were labeled as misordered/not indicated;
- Eight tests were classified as misordered/false reassurance; and
- 12 tests were determined to be misordered/inadequate.
“We know there is an ever-expanding number of genetic tests available for clinicians to order, and there is more direct marketing to the patient,” stated Ruzzo in an Ob. Gyn. News article. “It can be difficult to stay on top of that as we have so many different clinical responsibilities.”
Kathleen Ruzzo, MD (above right) and Monica Lutgendorf, MD (above left) of the Naval Medical Center in San Diego, reviewed 114 genetic tests ordered during a three-month period. They discovered that 39% of the tests were misordered according to guidelines, costing a total of $75,000. (Photo copyright: Naval Medical Center.)
The actual testing was performed by Laboratory Corporation of America and occurred over a three-month period. The seven common genetic tests that were reviewed were tests for:
The cost analysis of the tests revealed that $20,000 could have been saved by following the GeneReviews guidelines. The total costs affiliated with the 114 tests reached $75,000. Potential savings were thus 26.6% of the total cost of the genetic tests involved in this study. In many clinical settings, if pathologists and medical laboratory managers could help physicians better utilize genetic tests while reducing the cost of such testing by almost 27%, that would be a major contribution. Plus, patients would be getting better care.
Ordering the Right Genetic Test Saves Money and Protects Patients
According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), costs affiliated with genetic tests can range from less than $100 to more than $2,000 depending on the type and intricacy of the test. The NIH notes that many insurance companies will pay for genetic testing if ordered by a physician.
Ruzzo also shared that many of her cohorts were surprised at the results of the research.
“I think it opened a lot of people’s eyes … to be more meticulous about [genetic] testing and to ask for help when you need help,” she stated in the Ob. Gyn. News article. “Having trained individuals, reviewing genetic tests could save money in the healthcare system more broadly. We could also approve the appropriate testing for the patient.”
Ruzzo did admit there were limitations to the study; the researchers only looked at small amounts of tests for a short period and they did not concentrate on the consequences of the misordering to the patients.
Monica Lutgendorf, MD, Maternal Fetal Medicine Physician at the Naval Medical Center, was one of the coauthors of the paper. In the Ob. Gyn. News article, she described the findings as “a call to action in general for ob-gyns to get additional training and resources to handle the ever-expanding number of [genetic] tests.”
“I don’t think that this is unique to any specific institution. I think this is part of the new environment of practice that we’re in,” Lutgendorf concluded.
Due to the costs of genetic testing and the fact that so many physicians have not been able to keep up with all the latest advances in genetic medicine and testing, misordering will, most likely, continue to be a problem. Nevertheless, pathologists and clinical laboratory managers can serve a crucial role in helping physicians be more effective at selecting the correct genetic tests and assisting them in interpreting results to choose the most appropriate therapies for their patients.
Meanwhile, for those pathologists and medical laboratory professionals interested in developing effective utilization management programs for lab tests, Dark Daily is presenting a special webinar, titled, “Simple, Swift Approaches to Lab Test Utilization Management: Proven Ways for Your Clinical Laboratory to Use Data and Collaborations to Add Value.” It will take place on Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 1PM EDT.
For information about this high-value webinar and to register, use this link (or copy this URL and paste into your browser: https://ddaily.wpengine.com/webinar/simple-swift-approaches-to-lab-test-utilization-management-proven-ways-for-your-clinical-laboratory-to-use-data-and-collaborations-to-add-value.)
—JP Schlingman
Related Information:
More Than One-Third of Genetic Tests Misordered, Study Finds
Genetic Tests Often Overused and Misinterpreted, Sometimes with Tragic Consequences
Webinar: Simple, Swift Approaches to Lab Test Utilization Management: Proven Ways for Your Clinical Laboratory to Use Data and Collaborations to Add Value
Research Awards Announced for ACOG 2017 Annual Meeting
Unnecessary Genetic Tests Wastes $500 Million Annually
Mar 16, 2017 | Instruments & Equipment, Laboratory Instruments & Laboratory Equipment, Laboratory Management and Operations, Laboratory News, Laboratory Operations, Laboratory Pathology, Laboratory Testing, Management & Operations
Every medical laboratory ready to begin the move away from fee-for-service payment and towards value-based reimbursement needs to start offering lab tests that support the practice of precision medicine
Nearly every clinical laboratory and pathology group in America today is aware of the opportunity to provide medical laboratory tests that enable physicians to successfully practice precision medicine. The goal of precision medicine is to enable a patient to get a more accurate diagnosis, receive the most appropriate therapy, and have his/her condition monitored with unprecedented insight during the course of treatment.
The good news for the clinical laboratory industry concerning precision medicine is that it is the fastest-growing sector of lab testing and these are the tests that contribute the greatest value in patient care. For example, molecular and genetic tests are revolutionizing the diagnosis and treatment of infectious disease. These are the clinical lab tests that enable a physician to identify the specific subtype of the bacteria or virus, then help him or her select the therapeutic drug that will have maximum benefit for the patient.
Clinical Laboratories Support Cancer Diagnosis with Companion Diagnostic Tests
It is equally true that the diagnosis and treatment of cancer is undergoing a major transformation. Genetic knowledge is being used to develop both diagnostic tests and new therapies that enable physicians to better diagnose cancer, and then treat it with the drugs identified by a companion diagnostic test as having the best potential to cure the patient or slow the progression of the disease.
But if there is an area of precision medicine with immense potential, it is pharmacogenomics and its associated testing.
In 2015, the Kaiser Family Foundation reported that more than four billion prescriptions were filled in the United States. As science understands more about the human genome, proteome, metabolome, and microbiome (to name just a few of the “omes”), it becomes possible to design clinical laboratory tests that:
1. Contribute to a more accurate diagnosis;
2. Identify which prescription drugs will be of the greatest benefit; and
3. Inform the physician as to which drugs will not be effective and may even be harmful to the patient.
More Good News for Medical Laboratories
There is even more good news. Many clinical laboratories, hospital labs, and pathology groups already have lab instruments capable of performing the tests used in precision medicine. For these labs, no major up-front investment is needed to begin offering tests that allow physicians to practice precision medicine.
“Many of our lab clients got started in this way,” stated Don Rule, MBA, Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Translational Software in Bellevue, Wash. “They realized that their existing lab instruments could run some of the lab tests physicians use when practicing precision medicine. This would be a low-cost way to enter the precision medicine field and they could, on a small scale with minimal risk, begin offering these tests to gain experience, learn more about the market, and identify which such tests would have highest value to the physicians in the communities they serve.”
Is Your Pathology Group Interested in Supporting Precision Medicine?
“For a lab that is serious about understanding the current and future clinical demand for precision medicine tests, several careful steps are recommended,” he continued. “One step is to build demand by educating clinicians and their staffs about the best ways to use these tests to improve patient care. Keep in mind that more of a physician’s reimbursement is now keyed to the patient outcomes they deliver. These doctors recognize that labs helping them do a better job with precision medicine are also helping them demonstrate greater value in the patient care they provide.
“There are other steps required to launch an effective, clinically successful precision medicine testing program,” Rule noted. “For example, labs need to understand how to be paid by the health insurers in their region. That includes getting in-network and teaching physicians and lab staff how to follow each payer’s clinical and coding criteria so that clean claims will be paid in a timely manner.
“Another step is to build the market in a careful fashion,” he emphasized. “For example, labs should identify the thought leaders among their clients and work with them to demonstrate the clinical utility of tests performed in support of precision medicine. And above all, it’s important to focus on patients that are most likely to get some insight from testing. When your lab starts with the right population, it’s remarkable how often you will uncover actionable issues.”
Clinical Labs Can Enter Precision Medicine by Initially Referring Tests
“It’s also feasible for a lab to start its precision medicine strategy by referring out testing in the early stages and using third-party experts to do the interpretations,” Rule advised. “Then, as specimen volume increases, and the lab’s clinical team gains more experience with these molecular and genetic tests, it becomes easy to bring that testing in-house to develop the market further with faster turnaround times and in-house expertise that local physicians appreciate.”
Every clinical lab, hospital lab, and pathology group that is considering how to support precision medicine will want to participate in a special webinar, titled, “What Molecular and Genetic Testing Labs Need to Know to Succeed with Commercialization of Their Precision Medicine Products.” It will take place on Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 1 PM EDT.
Two expert speakers will cover the essentials that all labs should know about building a market presence in precision medicine. First to present is Don Rule of Translational Software. Rule currently provides a variety of services to more than 80 lab clients, which includes the annotation and interpretation of gene sequences. In addition, Rule and his team provide consulting expertise to help labs develop their strategies for precision medicine, identify the best tests to offer physicians, and develop the steps needed to obtain network status with payers.
Webinar Will Present the Best Successes of Molecular, Genetic Testing Labs
Rule will share the experiences and best successes of the molecular and genetic testing labs he has worked with since 2009. He will discuss the types of lab tests used in precision medicine in different specialties, identify the fastest-growing sectors, and note which instruments already found in most clinical laboratories can be used to provide lab tests used for precision medicine.
Don Rule (above left), Founder and CEO of Translational Software, and Kyle Fetter (above right), Vice President of Advanced Diagnostics at XIFIN, will share their unique insights, knowledge, and experience at developing a precision medicine lab testing program for clinical laboratories that want to build more market share, make the billing/collections team more effective, and increase revenue. (Photo copyright: Dark Daily.)
As one example, a growing number of long-term care facilities are using tests to practice precision medicine—and paying for these tests under value-based arrangements—because so many of their patients are taking from 10 to 15 prescriptions each day. If a lab test indicates that the patient may not be getting therapeutic benefit from a specific drug (or that there are negative side effects from the polypharmacy), then the long-term care facility is money ahead because of less spending on drugs and the decreased care costs from patients who remain healthier. In the extreme case, the care facility might lose a patient to a skilled nursing facility due to mental fog or a fall that is precipitated by adverse drug effects.
Making the Case for a Precision Medicine Lab Testing Program
Additional topics to be discussed are:
• How to make the case to administration and the clinicians;
• How to build demand; and
• How to identify thought leaders and work with them to educate the physicians in the lab’s service region.
The second speaker will address the important topic of how to get paid. Kyle Fetter, MBA, is Vice President of Advanced Diagnostics at XIFIN, Inc., based in San Diego. XIFIN provides revenue cycle management (RCM) services to more than 200 labs and handles as many as 300 million lab test claims annually. What this means is that Fetter sees which labs are most successful with their coding, billing, and collections for molecular and genetic tests. He also sees how different payers are handling these claims.
During his presentation, Fetter will provide you and your lab team with valuable knowledge about the best ways to collect the information needed to submit clean claims and be paid promptly. He will illustrate ways to optimize the process of gathering this data and the different software tools that not only make the job easier, but help ensure that a higher proportion of claims are clean and paid at first submission.
Secrets of Preparing for Payer Challenges, Denials, and Audits
But the single best element of Fetter’s presentation will be how labs performing molecular and genetic testing should prepare, as part of the normal course of business, for the inevitable challenges, denials, and audits. He will describe the elements of a system that helps labs be ready to make the case that claims are properly documented, and that they represent appropriate and necessary tests for the patient.
You can find details for this important webinar at this link. (Or copy this URL and paste it into your browser: https://www.darkdaily.com/webinar/what-molecular-and-genetic-testing-labs-need-to-know-to-succeed-with-commercialization-of-their-precision-medicine-products.)
This webinar is perfect for any lab that is already performing molecular and genetic tests, and which is interested in building more market share, making the billing/collections team more effective, and increasing revenue.
For every lab watching the precision medicine space, this webinar is a “must attend” because it delivers to you and your lab team the collective knowledge and insights from two experts who are working with hundreds of the nation’s most successful labs. It is your guaranteed way to get the accurate, relevant information you need to craft your own lab’s strategy for expanding its molecular and genetic testing opportunities.
—Michael McBride
Related Information:
Genetic Tests and Precision Medicine Start to Win Acceptance by Some Payers; Pathologists and Clinical Laboratories Have Opportunity as Advisors
Feb 6, 2017 | Laboratory Hiring & Human Resources, Laboratory Pathology, Laboratory Testing
As chronic disease and aging populations strain the UK’s medical systems, staffing shortages at pathology laboratories contribute to lengthening delays of critical diagnostic services
In the United Kingdom (UK), pathologists and other physicians are going public with their concerns that a growing shortage of pathologists and medical laboratory scientists will soon contribute to delays in performing the lab tests needed to diagnose patients—particularly those with cancer—and identify which therapies will work best for them.
Thanks to vast improvements to both medical laboratory capabilities and treatment options, the cancer survival rate in the UK doubled over the past four decades. However, early diagnosis is a critical component to a successful outcome. As further strain is placed on medical laboratories and diagnostic providers, wait times continue to increase beyond the thresholds created by the UK’s National Health Service (NHS).
Worsening an already dire situation, a November 2016 report from Cancer Research UK, “Testing Times to Come? An Evaluation of Pathology Capacity Across the UK,” predicts a critical shortage in laboratory staffing within the next decade. Data on Provider-based Cancer Waiting Times for August 2016 from National Health Service England shows that 17.2% of patients with an urgent referral for suspected cancer fail to start treatment within two months of the referral. (more…)
